Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaAleph Alpha

Kolibri-1

Performance benchmark · measured on 08.10.2026 18:04

Benchmark-IDrun-20261008-165122-05f32b
Kolibri Prefill-Decode 1024-256 - Summenraten C1 C5 C10 V1MoE78.1BRuntime: serverphasetimingQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
ℹ
Public note: Summenrate fuer C10 = C mal gewichtete serverseitige Phasenrate je Anfrage. Kein End-to-End-Batchdurchsatz. Individuelle vLLM-Phasenzeiten sind nicht vorhanden; dies ist eine normierte Summenrate, nicht die nachtraeglich rekonstruierte Summe einzelner Threadraten. Originale Anfrageraten und Batches bleiben im Messprotokoll. Modell einheitlich Kolibri-1; Quantisierung im separaten Feld.
ℹ
For context: Diese Plattform nutzt Unified Memory – die "VRAM" ist gemeinsamer System-RAM (APU/Superchip); das Modell teilt sich den Speicher mit dem System.
Generation158,18tok/s
Prefill2.213,39tok/s
Time to First Token6.611,00ms
Total duration68,45s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
1of 13 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 100 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 158,2 tok/s
+98 % vs Ø 80,0
Prefill 2.213,4 tok/s
+67 % vs Ø 1.327,7
Time to First Token 6.611 ms
-69 % vs Ø 21.349
Distribution in the field17 – 158 tok/s
Ø 80 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics
CPU: AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S
RAM: 31 GB
Mainboard: Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd SHWSA (MS-S1 MAX)

Setup

Runtime: serverphasetiming
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Kolibri-1

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20261008-165122-05f32b
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Kolibri-1 # Run-ID : run-20261008-165122-05f32b # GPU : AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics # CPU : AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S # RAM : 31 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ cat benchmark.conf execution_type local
execution_typelocal

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Kolibri-1 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.3269956633320,0014.11528.23142.346Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.044,4 tok/s Generation, 34.389 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 192 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 158,2 tok/s Generation, 1.648 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.695 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.044,4 tok/s★ AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 158,2 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

1.3269956633320,0014.11528.23142.346Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 1.044,4 tok/s Generation, 34.389 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 192 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 158,2 tok/s Generation, 1.648 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.695 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 1.044,4 tok/s★ AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 158,2 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

1.3269956633320,0014.11528.23142.346Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) - 1.044,4 tok/s Generation, 34.389 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 192 ms (12 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd SHWSA (MS-S1 MAX) - 158,2 tok/s Generation, 1.648 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.695 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Meigao Innovation Tec...
Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 1.044,4 tok/s★ Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd SHWSA (MS-S1 MAX) 158,2 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

1.1771.07597487277007.44814.89522.343Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.044,4 tok/s Generation, 18.018 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.967 ms (6 Laufe)unbekanntvLLM - 902,9 tok/s Generation, 0 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 177 ms (9 Laufe)vLLM
unbekannt 1.044,4 tok/svLLM 902,9 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.1491.0971.04499294016.93717.65818.37919.099Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.044,4 tok/s Generation, 18.018 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 893 ms (15 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.044,4 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 18 W
⚡ TDP 120 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)120 W estimated (TDP)GPU 120 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.036
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.063
Token / kWh4.75M
Acquisition (system)EUR 7,454 partial priceGPU EUR 3,000 · Board EUR 3,900 · RAM EUR 434 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)–
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,085
Output tokens (2 years)9.98B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)–
Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (18 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Kolibri-1AMD Radeon 8060S GraphicsKolibri-1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionKolibri-1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionKolibri-1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)––––
Acquisition cost––––
Total cost (TCO)––––
Generated tokens (24 mo.)––––
Token price via API––––
Break-even point (days)––––
Result (savings / extra cost)––––

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.