Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 22.09.2026 09:08

Benchmark-IDrun-20260922-074333-6bf6dd
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense7BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q8_0
Generation58,79tok/s
Prefill4.165,66tok/s
Time to First Token592,50ms
Total duration36,02s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
115of 495 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 77 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 58,8 tok/s
+53 % vs Ø 38,4
Prefill 4.165,7 tok/s
+101 % vs Ø 2.067,8
Time to First Token 593 ms
-98 % vs Ø 33.042
Distribution in the field1 – 227 tok/s
Ø 38 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor
RAM: 31 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q8_0
Model: Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260922-074333-6bf6dd
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260922-074333-6bf6dd # GPU : AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 # CPU : AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor # RAM : 31 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/models/qwen2.5-7b-instruct-q8_0-00001-of-00003.gguf \ --alias Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 49152 \ -np 12 '(AMD' Radeon AI PRO R9700, ROCm 7.2.4, 'HIP_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0)'
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.49152
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/models/qwen2.5-7b-instruct-q8_0-00001-of-00003.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.49152
np12
execution_typelocal

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

54342230118059,72.0075.0778.14711.216Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX - 442,0 tok/s Generation, 9.575 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.732 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 160,3 tok/s Generation, 3.649 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.816 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 250,6 tok/s Generation, 6.580 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.039 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 442,0 tok/s★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 250,6 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 160,3 tok/s

CPUby processor

54342230118059,72.0075.0778.14711.216Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores - 442,0 tok/s Generation, 9.575 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.732 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz - 160,3 tok/s Generation, 3.649 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.816 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor - 250,6 tok/s Generation, 6.580 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.039 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Co...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores 442,0 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor 250,6 tok/s this runIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 160,3 tok/s

MBby mainboard

54342230118059,72.0075.0778.14711.216Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 442,0 tok/s Generation, 9.575 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.732 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 160,3 tok/s Generation, 3.649 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.816 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING - 250,6 tok/s Generation, 6.580 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.039 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 442,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 250,6 tok/s this runDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 160,3 tok/s

ENGby engine

5224373522661814.0127.24910.48513.722Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 442,0 tok/s Generation, 11.912 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.633 ms (3 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 261,4 tok/s Generation, 5.822 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.562 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
vLLM 442,0 tok/s★ llama.cpp 261,4 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

4864644424203986.9047.1987.4927.785Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 442,0 tok/s Generation, 7.345 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.330 ms (12 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 442,0 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 20 W
⚡ TDP 300 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)300 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.090
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.43
Token / kWh705.48K
Acquisition (system)EUR 1,520 partial priceGPU EUR 1,400 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)–
TCO (2 years)EUR 3,097
Output tokens (2 years)3.71B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)–
Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (20 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen2.5-7B-InstructAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct2x AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXQwen2.5-7B-Instruct2x AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXQwen2.5-7B-Instruct2x NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
Electricity cost (24 mo.)––––
Acquisition cost––––
Total cost (TCO)––––
Generated tokens (24 mo.)––––
Token price via API––––
Break-even point (days)––––
Result (savings / extra cost)––––

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.