Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaPoolside

Laguna-S-2.1-INT4

Performance benchmark · measured on 05.08.2026 12:48

Benchmark-IDrun-20260806-094436-11dd24
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Runtime: llama.cppQuantisierung: INT4
Generation11,64tok/s
Prefill75,89tok/s
Time to First Token36.234,50ms
Total duration216,54s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
119of 175 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 32 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 11,6 tok/s
-60 % vs Ø 28,8
Prefill 75,9 tok/s
-94 % vs Ø 1.239,7
Time to First Token 36.235 ms
+18 % vs Ø 30.683
Distribution in the field1 – 140 tok/s
Ø 29 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: INT4
Model: Laguna-S-2.1-INT4

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260806-094436-11dd24
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Laguna-S-2.1-INT4 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260806-094436-11dd24 # GPU : AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF/snapshots/750f92f90cf54159c4d7a610cb7b3e74498e75c6/UD-Q4_K_M/Laguna-S-2.1-UD-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00003.gguf \ --alias Laguna-S-2.1-INT4 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Laguna-S-2.1-INT4
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF/snapshots/750f92f90cf54159c4d7a610cb7b3e74498e75c6/UD-Q4_K_M/Laguna-S-2.1-UD-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00003.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Videoreihe und Benchmarkauswertung zur AMD R9700
Model comparison

Laguna-S-2.1-INT4 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.0838125422710,001.3262.6533.979Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 3.223 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.915 ms (7 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 779,8 tok/s Generation, 3.220 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.242 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 42,3 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.435 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 31,6 tok/s Generation, 162 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 129.948 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 13,3 tok/s Generation, 95 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 143.534 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 70,5 tok/s Generation, 1.059 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 145.025 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 835,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 779,8 tok/s★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 70,5 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 42,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 31,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 13,3 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.0838125422710,001.3262.6533.979Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 3.223 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.915 ms (7 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 779,8 tok/s Generation, 3.220 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.242 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 42,3 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.435 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 31,6 tok/s Generation, 162 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 129.948 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 13,3 tok/s Generation, 95 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 143.534 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 70,5 tok/s Generation, 1.059 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 145.025 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 835,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 779,8 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 70,5 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 42,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 31,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 13,3 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.0838125422710,001.3262.6533.979Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 3.223 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.915 ms (7 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 42,3 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.435 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 31,6 tok/s Generation, 162 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 129.948 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 13,3 tok/s Generation, 95 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 143.534 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 779,8 tok/s Generation, 2.031 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 83.472 ms (20 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 835,1 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 779,8 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 42,3 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 31,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 13,3 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.0728045362680,05542.5194.4856.450Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 70,5 tok/s Generation, 5.430 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.742 ms (2 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 1.574 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 86.974 ms (34 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 835,1 tok/s this runvLLM 70,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

9198778357937521.6811.7521.8241.895Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 1.788 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 82.461 ms (36 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 835,1 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 85 W
⚡ TDP 371 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)371 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 2.66
Token / kWh112.95K
Acquisition (system)EUR 6,824 full priceGPU EUR 1,400 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,774
Output tokens (2 years)734.16M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (85 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Laguna-S-2.1-INT4AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Laguna-S-2.1-INT4NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLaguna-S-2.1-INT43x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionLaguna-S-2.1-INT43x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.