Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B

Performance benchmark · measured on 05.08.2026 02:16

Benchmark-IDrun-20260805-053414-7802a9
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE120BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation9,96tok/s
Prefill61,13tok/s
Time to First Token35.262,50ms
Total duration276,25s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
93of 125 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 26 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 10,0 tok/s
-70 % vs Ø 33,0
Prefill 61,1 tok/s
-96 % vs Ø 1.692,2
Time to First Token 35.263 ms
+56 % vs Ø 22.553
Distribution in the field1 – 140 tok/s
Ø 33 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260805-053414-7802a9
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260805-053414-7802a9 # GPU : AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/fe70b8fa41864e382a726d44b138588c124d7337/nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16.Q4_K_M-00001-of-00006.gguf \ --alias NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/fe70b8fa41864e382a726d44b138588c124d7337/nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B-BF16.Q4_K_M-00001-of-00006.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

7815853901950,006591.3171.976Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 600,9 tok/s Generation, 1.211 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 57.884 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 423,4 tok/s Generation, 1.599 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 40.567 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 32,6 tok/s Generation, 88 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 156.105 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 18,9 tok/s Generation, 106 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 171.396 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 2,5 tok/s Generation, 41 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 178.259 ms (5 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 23,3 tok/s Generation, 108 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 162.903 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 600,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 423,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 32,6 tok/s★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 23,3 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 18,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 2,5 tok/s

CPUby processor

7815853901950,006591.3171.976Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 600,9 tok/s Generation, 1.211 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 57.884 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 423,4 tok/s Generation, 1.599 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 40.567 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 32,6 tok/s Generation, 88 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 156.105 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 18,9 tok/s Generation, 106 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 171.396 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 2,5 tok/s Generation, 41 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 178.259 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 23,3 tok/s Generation, 108 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 162.903 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 600,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 423,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 32,6 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 23,3 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 18,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 2,5 tok/s

MBby mainboard

7815853901950,004989971.495Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 600,9 tok/s Generation, 1.211 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 57.884 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 32,6 tok/s Generation, 88 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 156.105 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 18,9 tok/s Generation, 106 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 171.396 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 2,5 tok/s Generation, 41 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 178.259 ms (5 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 423,4 tok/s Generation, 779 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 107.852 ms (20 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 600,9 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 423,4 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 32,6 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 18,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 2,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

661631601571541562586610633Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 600,9 tok/s Generation, 598 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 121.161 ms (40 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 600,9 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

661631601571541562586610633Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 600,9 tok/s Generation, 598 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 121.161 ms (40 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 600,9 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 85 W
⚡ TDP 371 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)371 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 3.10
Token / kWh96.65K
Acquisition (system)EUR 6,824 full priceGPU EUR 1,400 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,774
Output tokens (2 years)628.20M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (85 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12BAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Super-120B-A12B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.