Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.6-27B

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 09:38

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-105339-68e193
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense27BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation247,53tok/s
Prefill4.167,81tok/s
Time to First Token6.590,00ms
Total duration79,81s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
439of 1234 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 64 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 247,5 tok/s
-5 % vs Ø 260,2
Prefill 4.167,8 tok/s
-22 % vs Ø 5.330,6
Time to First Token 6.590 ms
-78 % vs Ø 29.782
Distribution in the field0 – 1.349 tok/s
Ø 260 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-0adf6d
1.349,3 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-5b4937
1.301,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-30d864
1.188,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-5432cd
1.164,8 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-9e81f9
1.136,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-09627f
1.135,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-058a31
1.113,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-305ad6
1.007,8 tok/s
Qwen3.6-27B this run3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105339-68e193
247,5 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · 96 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores
RAM: 125 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Qwen3.6-27B

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-105339-68e193
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3.6-27B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-105339-68e193 # GPU : 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores # RAM : 125 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DavidAU--Qwen3.6-27B-Fable-Fusion-711-Uncensored-Heretic-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF/snapshots/ee5b7441ffe27869e1e5b4357733248d561c26b7/Qwen3.6-27B-Fable-Fus-711-UnHeretic-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-NEO-MTP-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen3.6-27B \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3.6-27B
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DavidAU--Qwen3.6-27B-Fable-Fusion-711-Uncensored-Heretic-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF/snapshots/ee5b7441ffe27869e1e5b4357733248d561c26b7/Qwen3.6-27B-Fable-Fus-711-UnHeretic-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-NEO-MTP-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3.6-27B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

7045283521760,001.1052.2103.315Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 546,9 tok/s Generation, 2.739 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.126 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 532,5 tok/s Generation, 2.539 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.812 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 431,7 tok/s Generation, 2.362 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.109 ms (27 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 264,2 tok/s Generation, 1.458 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.358 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 165,4 tok/s Generation, 1.380 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 28.271 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 106,8 tok/s Generation, 600 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.996 ms (4 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 57,2 tok/s Generation, 447 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 80.318 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 36,1 tok/s Generation, 536 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.917 ms (1 Lauf)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 464,1 tok/s Generation, 2.737 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.091 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 546,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 532,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 464,1 tok/s this runNVIDIA RTX A6000 431,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 264,2 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 165,4 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 106,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 57,2 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 36,1 tok/s

CPUby processor

7045283521760,001.2962.5913.887Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 546,9 tok/s Generation, 1.883 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.524 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 532,5 tok/s Generation, 2.539 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.812 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 431,7 tok/s Generation, 2.117 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.149 ms (36 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 264,2 tok/s Generation, 1.458 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.358 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 106,8 tok/s Generation, 534 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.848 ms (7 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 36,1 tok/s Generation, 536 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.917 ms (1 Lauf)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 464,1 tok/s Generation, 3.212 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.084 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 546,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 532,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 464,1 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 431,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 264,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 106,8 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 36,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

7055293531760,0211.0312.0423.052Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 546,9 tok/s Generation, 2.204 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.875 ms (4 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 532,5 tok/s Generation, 2.539 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.812 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 264,2 tok/s Generation, 1.458 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.358 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 106,8 tok/s Generation, 534 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.848 ms (7 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 36,1 tok/s Generation, 536 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.917 ms (1 Lauf)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...unbekannt - 28,8 tok/s Generation, 599 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122 ms (1 Lauf)unbekanntASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 464,1 tok/s Generation, 2.336 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.736 ms (45 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 546,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 532,5 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 464,1 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 264,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 106,8 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 36,1 tok/sunbekannt 28,8 tok/s

ENGby engine

7055293531760,001.6393.2784.917Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 431,7 tok/s Generation, 4.052 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.692 ms (10 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 28,8 tok/s Generation, 599 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122 ms (1 Lauf)unbekanntllama.cpp - 546,9 tok/s Generation, 1.692 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 18.794 ms (53 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 546,9 tok/s this runvLLM 431,7 tok/sunbekannt 28,8 tok/s

DRVby driver

7055293531760,02119591.7072.455Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 546,9 tok/s Generation, 2.067 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.238 ms (63 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 580.159.03 / CUDA 13.0 - 28,8 tok/s Generation, 599 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA 580.159.03 / C...
unbekannt 546,9 tok/sNVIDIA 580.159.03 / CUDA 13.0 28,8 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 165 W
⚡ TDP 983 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)983 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 57 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.33
Token / kWh906.98K
Acquisition (system)EUR 45,748 full priceGPU EUR 39,000 · CPU EUR 3,499 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 1,750 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 50,912
Output tokens (2 years)15.61B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (165 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3.6-27B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen3.6-27BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3.6-27BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3.6-27B2x NVIDIA RTX A6000
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.