Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaGoogle

Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 09:12

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-105338-1cf1e0
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE26BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: UD-Q4_K_XL
Generation1.479,41tok/s
Prefill6.414,48tok/s
Time to First Token8.654,00ms
Total duration48,49s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
47of 131 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 65 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 1.479,4 tok/s
+45 % vs Ø 1.022,8
Prefill 6.414,5 tok/s
-26 % vs Ø 8.634,9
Time to First Token 8.654 ms
-52 % vs Ø 17.912
Distribution in the field40 – 2.144 tok/s
Ø 1.023 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-d87c73
2.143,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-0aed86
1.937,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-8db0fa
1.911,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-e0eafd
1.897,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-26063b
1.835,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-a77046
1.830,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-c6e7e0
1.819,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-2b99aa
1.802,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-1cc62d
1.742,1 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-3fa079
1.655,2 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-be087a
1.654,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-2fab14
1.651,0 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-b8a790
1.650,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-34c4d6
1.649,9 tok/s
Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it this run3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105338-1cf1e0
1.479,4 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · 96 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores
RAM: 125 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: UD-Q4_K_XL
Model: Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-105338-1cf1e0
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-105338-1cf1e0 # GPU : 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores # RAM : 125 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-qat-GGUF/snapshots/7b92b5b28818151e8669af2e45e88d6086f490dd/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-qat-UD-Q4_K_XL.gguf \ --alias Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-qat-GGUF/snapshots/7b92b5b28818151e8669af2e45e88d6086f490dd/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-qat-UD-Q4_K_XL.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.9791.4849894950,002.9185.8368.754Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.540,5 tok/s Generation, 4.006 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.749 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 1.009,0 tok/s Generation, 3.578 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.953 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 926,2 tok/s Generation, 3.620 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.478 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 119,5 tok/s Generation, 773 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.904 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.479,9 tok/s Generation, 7.172 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.769 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.540,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.479,9 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.009,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 926,2 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 119,5 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.9791.4849894950,002.9185.8368.754Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.540,5 tok/s Generation, 4.006 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.749 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 1.009,0 tok/s Generation, 3.578 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.953 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 926,2 tok/s Generation, 3.620 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.478 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 119,5 tok/s Generation, 773 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.904 ms (5 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.479,9 tok/s Generation, 7.172 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.769 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.540,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.479,9 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1.009,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 926,2 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 119,5 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.9791.4849894950,002.9185.8368.754Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.540,5 tok/s Generation, 4.006 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.749 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 1.009,0 tok/s Generation, 3.578 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.953 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 926,2 tok/s Generation, 3.620 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.478 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 119,5 tok/s Generation, 773 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.904 ms (5 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.479,9 tok/s Generation, 7.172 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.769 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.540,5 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.479,9 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1.009,0 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 926,2 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 119,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.6951.6171.5401.4631.3864.1704.3474.5254.702Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.540,5 tok/s Generation, 4.436 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.216 ms (23 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.540,5 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

1.6951.6171.5401.4631.3864.1704.3474.5254.702Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.540,5 tok/s Generation, 4.436 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.216 ms (23 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.540,5 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 165 W
⚡ TDP 983 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)983 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 57 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.055
Token / kWh5.42M
Acquisition (system)EUR 45,748 full priceGPU EUR 39,000 · CPU EUR 3,499 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 1,750 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 50,912
Output tokens (2 years)93.31B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (165 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionGemma-4-26B-A4B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionGemma-4-26B-A4B-it3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.