# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : MiniMax-M2.5 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260728-164528-587188 # GPU : 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores # RAM : 125 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--exdysa--MiniMax-M2.5-REAP-172B-A10B-GGUF-Q4_K_M/snapshots/c5518e6b02673458388328830793414ef5bfba5c/MiniMax-M2.5-REAP-172B-A10B-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias MiniMax-M2.5 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja

Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.	llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.	MiniMax-M2.5
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.	16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.	/home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--exdysa--MiniMax-M2.5-REAP-172B-A10B-GGUF-Q4_K_M/snapshots/c5518e6b02673458388328830793414ef5bfba5c/MiniMax-M2.5-REAP-172B-A10B-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.	999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.	16384
np	4
execution_type	local

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 551,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA DGX SPARK (GB10) 103,5 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 66,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 22,5 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 19,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 15,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 7,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 4,4 tok/sAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 4,0 tok/sCPU-only 0,8 tok/s

CPUby processor

★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 551,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA Grace 103,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 66,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 22,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 15,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 7,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 4,4 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 4,0 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 0,8 tok/s

MBby mainboard

★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 551,0 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 103,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 22,5 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 15,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 7,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 4,4 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 4,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

★ llama.cpp 551,0 tok/s this runvLLM 103,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

unbekannt 551,0 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 103,5 tok/s

💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URL Reset

⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh

⚙️ System utilization 100 %

🖥️ Acquisition EUR

🔌 Idle 165 W

⚡ TDP 983 W

☁️ External LLM (API) show

Input €/1M Output €/1M Input per output token

Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh

Avg power (incl. idle)983 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 57 + Board 25 W full load

Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29

Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.26

Token / kWh1.16M

Acquisition (system)EUR 45,748 full priceGPU EUR 39,000 · CPU EUR 3,499 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 1,750 · PSU EUR 200

Electricity (2 years)–

TCO (2 years)EUR 50,912

Output tokens (2 years)19.98B

☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison

External LLM cost (2 years)–

Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (165 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

	MiniMax-M2.53x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition	MiniMax-M2.53x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition	MiniMax-M2.53x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition	MiniMax-M2.5NVIDIA DGX SPARK (GB10)
Electricity cost (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Acquisition cost	–	–	–	–
Total cost (TCO)	–	–	–	–
Generated tokens (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Token price via API	–	–	–	–
Break-even point (days)	–	–	–	–
Result (savings / extra cost)	–	–	–	–

3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · this run 317 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 315 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 315 tok/s NVIDIA DGX SPARK (GB10) 78 tok/s

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.