Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaOpenAI

gpt-oss-20b

Performance benchmark · measured on 28.07.2026 10:47

Benchmark-IDrun-20260728-140954-9e81f9
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE20BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation1.136,34tok/s
Prefill14.249,36tok/s
Time to First Token1.690,50ms
Total duration17,55s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
3of 189 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 99 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 1.136,3 tok/s
+299 % vs Ø 284,9
Prefill 14.249,4 tok/s
+171 % vs Ø 5.264,8
Time to First Token 1.691 ms
-93 % vs Ø 25.716
Distribution in the field0 – 1.349 tok/s
Ø 283 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · 96 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor
RAM: 92 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: gpt-oss-20b

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260728-140954-9e81f9
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : gpt-oss-20b # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260728-140954-9e81f9 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor # RAM : 92 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--gpt-oss-20b-GGUF/snapshots/d449b42d93e1c2c7bda5312f5c25c8fb91dfa9b4/gpt-oss-20b-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias gpt-oss-20b \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.gpt-oss-20b
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--gpt-oss-20b-GGUF/snapshots/d449b42d93e1c2c7bda5312f5c25c8fb91dfa9b4/gpt-oss-20b-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

gpt-oss-20b on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.5891.9421.2946470,009.45018.90128.351Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.835,7 tok/s Generation, 5.231 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.820 ms (23 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.386,8 tok/s Generation, 10.818 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.747 ms (15 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 1.210,3 tok/s Generation, 4.544 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.765 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 1.113,5 tok/s Generation, 6.303 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.194 ms (18 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 340,5 tok/s Generation, 4.510 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.295 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 173,3 tok/s Generation, 1.028 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.849 ms (8 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...CPU-only - 14,5 tok/s Generation, 88 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122.346 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.993,5 tok/s Generation, 22.877 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.601 ms (5 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.993,5 tok/s this runNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.835,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.386,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.210,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 1.113,5 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 340,5 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 173,3 tok/sCPU-only 14,5 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.5891.9421.2946470,009.45018.90128.351Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.835,7 tok/s Generation, 5.231 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.820 ms (23 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.386,8 tok/s Generation, 10.818 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.747 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 1.210,3 tok/s Generation, 4.544 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.765 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 1.113,5 tok/s Generation, 6.303 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.194 ms (18 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 340,5 tok/s Generation, 4.510 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.295 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 173,3 tok/s Generation, 1.028 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.849 ms (8 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 14,5 tok/s Generation, 88 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122.346 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.993,5 tok/s Generation, 22.877 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.601 ms (5 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...
★ AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.993,5 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.835,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.386,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1.210,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 1.113,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 340,5 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 173,3 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 14,5 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.5891.9421.2946470,009.45018.90128.351Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.835,7 tok/s Generation, 5.173 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.778 ms (25 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.386,8 tok/s Generation, 10.818 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.747 ms (15 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 1.210,3 tok/s Generation, 4.544 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.765 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 1.113,5 tok/s Generation, 6.303 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.194 ms (18 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 173,3 tok/s Generation, 1.028 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.849 ms (8 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 14,5 tok/s Generation, 88 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122.346 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.993,5 tok/s Generation, 22.877 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.601 ms (5 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.993,5 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.835,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.386,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1.210,3 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 1.113,5 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 173,3 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 14,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.3032.0111.7191.4271.1354.0396.3228.60610.889Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 1.443,9 tok/s Generation, 9.561 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.945 ms (30 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.993,5 tok/s Generation, 5.367 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.064 ms (50 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.993,5 tok/s this runvLLM 1.443,9 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.1932.0931.9941.8941.7946.5236.8017.0797.356Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.993,5 tok/s Generation, 6.940 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.269 ms (80 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.993,5 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 70 W
⚡ TDP 644 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)644 W estimated (TDP)GPU 600 + CPU 29 + Board 15 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.19
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.047
Token / kWh6.35M
Acquisition (system)EUR 15,248 full priceGPU EUR 13,000 · CPU EUR 649 · Board EUR 499 · RAM EUR 920 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 18,632
Output tokens (2 years)71.67B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (70 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Editiongpt-oss-20b3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Editiongpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.