Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K
Performance benchmark · measured on 23.07.2026 18:42
Benchmark-ID
run-20260723-194447-85592fTimebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense47BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
ℹ
For context: Diese Plattform nutzt Unified Memory – die "VRAM" ist gemeinsamer System-RAM (APU/Superchip); das Modell teilt sich den Speicher mit dem System.
Generation10,66tok/s
Prefill159,53tok/s
Time to First Token61.556,00ms
Total duration477,88s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
16of 16 systems
Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent
This run is better than 0 % of all comparable systems.
Generation
10,7 tok/s
-88 % vs Ø 91,4
Prefill
159,5 tok/s
-84 % vs Ø 984,2
Time to First Token
61.556 ms
+105 % vs Ø 30.097
Distribution in the field11 – 327 tok/s
Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3BAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260820-184209-fe3575
326,9 tok/s
Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3BAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260723-142109-7781ae
101,7 tok/s
Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260820-184209-2e8259
98,3 tok/s
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260723-015518-6c8a89
97,8 tok/s
Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260819-104341-2012e7
95,4 tok/s
Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260820-184209-39ff2b
92,9 tok/s
Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260819-104341-c511eb
86,4 tok/s
Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260821-071254-6136b0
86,0 tok/s
Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260819-104341-53e03b
81,9 tok/s
Gemma-4-26B-A4B-itAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260725-031733-d3a49a
79,5 tok/s
Gemma-4-26B-A4B-itAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260725-031733-6b9e97
77,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260724-082941-bd14ba
71,9 tok/s
gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-assistantAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260725-031727-e0d1a8
67,3 tok/s
Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260723-142058-33784d
56,8 tok/s
Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K this runAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · run-20260723-194447-85592f
10,7 tok/s
How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?
Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Editionrun-20260729-032130-f92e97
127,6 tok/s
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090run-20260731-071558-1d773e
120,4 tok/s
3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Editionrun-20260801-072828-a71e35
118,4 tok/s
3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Editionrun-20260731-071558-e8e4c0
113,5 tok/s
3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Editionrun-20260731-071557-acec92
99,0 tok/s
2× NVIDIA RTX A6000run-20260830-075531-e883a2
51,7 tok/s
2× NVIDIA RTX A6000run-20260828-112515-3a348d
50,5 tok/s
NVIDIA RTX A6000run-20260826-155752-7e6e31
28,5 tok/s
4× AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700run-20260817-174452-cfa36c
25,0 tok/s
2× NVIDIA RTX A6000run-20260828-091411-e383c9
23,9 tok/s
4× AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700run-20260817-120945-b760f3
23,9 tok/s
2× NVIDIA RTX A6000run-20260830-025826-c5babe
23,1 tok/s
4× AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700run-20260817-120945-580db4
22,6 tok/s
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Tirun-20260729-105331-b199bc
14,4 tok/s
Hardware
GPU: AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics
CPU: AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S
RAM: 31 GB
Mainboard: Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series)
Setup
Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K
Configuration
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration
# Modell : Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K
# Engine : llama.cpp
# Run-ID : run-20260723-194447-85592f
# GPU : AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics
# CPU : AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S
# RAM : 31 GB
bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build-rocm/bin/llama-server \
-m /home/godcore/models/dl/nvidia_Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K-Q4_K_M.gguf \
--host 0.0.0.0 \
--port 8000 \
--gpu-layers 99 \
--flash-attn on \
-c 26624 \
--parallel 12
| Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind. | llamacpp |
| Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann. | 26624 |
| Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird. | /home/godcore/models/dl/nvidia_Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K-Q4_K_M.gguf |
| GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU. | 99 |
| Flash Attention?FlashAttention fuer schnellere und speichersparende Attention. Wert on/off/auto je nach Build. | on |
| Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells. | 26624 |
| Parallel?Anzahl paralleler Slots/Sequenzen, die der Server gleichzeitig bedient. Der Kontext wird auf die Slots aufgeteilt. | 12 |
Anzeige
Model comparison
Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K on various hardware
All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.
GPUby graphics card
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 203,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 197,2 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 174,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 88,1 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 28,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 20,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 16,9 tok/s★ AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 10,7 tok/s this run
CPUby processor
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 203,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 197,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 174,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 88,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 20,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 16,9 tok/s★ AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 10,7 tok/s this run
MBby mainboard
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 203,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 197,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 174,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 20,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 16,9 tok/s★ Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 10,7 tok/s this run
DRVby driver
unbekannt 203,5 tok/s
💰 Economics
Economics of this run
Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →
⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price
EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization
100 %
🖥️ Acquisition
EUR
🔌 Idle
18 W
⚡ TDP
120 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)120 W estimated (TDP)GPU 120 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.036
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.94
Token / kWh319.80K
Acquisition (system)EUR 7,054 partial priceGPU EUR 3,000 · Board EUR 3,500 · RAM EUR 434 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)–
TCO (2 years)EUR 7,685
Output tokens (2 years)672.35M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)–
Savings vs. external (2 years)–
All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (18 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.
Cost over 2 years – electricity only
Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)
Speed vs. tokens per euro
Euro per 1M tokens
Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark
| Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128KAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics | Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128KNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition | Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128KNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 | Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity cost (24 mo.) | – | – | – | – |
| Acquisition cost | – | – | – | – |
| Total cost (TCO) | – | – | – | – |
| Generated tokens (24 mo.) | – | – | – | – |
| Token price via API | – | – | – | – |
| Break-even point (days) | – | – | – | – |
| Result (savings / extra cost) | – | – | – | – |
AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics · this run 11 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 128 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 120 tok/s3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 118 tok/s
Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.
Contributed by
Mario Alka Administrator
@marioalka
Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.
Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.