Runtime: godclaw
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Operating system: Ubuntu 26.04 LTS (Kernel 7.0.0-27-generic)
Driver: AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
Model: Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct

Anmerkung

llama.cpp . 1 GPU . GGUF (unsloth/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260722-165906-0c9fde

# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct # Run-ID : run-20260722-165906-0c9fde # GPU : 3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 # CPU : 32x AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ cat benchmark.conf Konfigurationspfad /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf Engine llamacpp Modellalias Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct Kontextlaenge 8192 GPU-Layer 999 Host 0.0.0.0 Port 8000

Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.	llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.	Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.	8192
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.	/root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-GGUF/Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.	999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.	8192
Alias?Anzeigename des Modells nach aussen (served model name), unabhaengig vom Dateinamen.	Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct
Host?Netzwerk-Interface, an das der HTTP-Server bindet, z.B. 0.0.0.0 fuer alle Interfaces.	0.0.0.0
Port?TCP-Port des HTTP-Servers.	8000

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Model comparison

Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.716,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.690,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.545,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 928,5 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 277,0 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 182,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 157,0 tok/s★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 99,0 tok/s this runCPU-only 6,7 tok/s

CPUby processor

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.716,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.690,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.545,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 928,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 277,0 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 182,9 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 99,0 tok/s this runIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 6,7 tok/s

MBby mainboard

ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.716,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.690,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.545,3 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 928,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 277,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 182,9 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 6,7 tok/s

ENGby engine

llama.cpp 1.716,6 tok/svLLM 1.070,6 tok/sunbekannt 88,2 tok/s

DRVby driver

unbekannt 1.716,6 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 182,9 tok/s★ AMD 7.0.0-27-generic 88,2 tok/s this run

💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URL Reset

⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh

⚙️ System utilization 100 %

🖥️ Acquisition EUR

🔌 Idle 125 W

⚡ TDP 971 W

☁️ External LLM (API) show

Input €/1M Output €/1M Input per output token

Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh

Avg power (incl. idle)971 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load

Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29

Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 1.07

Token / kWh280.51K

Acquisition (system)EUR 9,674 full priceGPU EUR 4,200 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 200

Electricity (2 years)–

TCO (2 years)EUR 14,778

Output tokens (2 years)4.77B

☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison

External LLM cost (2 years)–

Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (125 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

	Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700	Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition	Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090	Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Acquisition cost	–	–	–	–
Total cost (TCO)	–	–	–	–
Generated tokens (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Token price via API	–	–	–	–
Break-even point (days)	–	–	–	–
Result (savings / extra cost)	–	–	–	–

3× AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · this run 76 tok/s NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 311 tok/s NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 309 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 274 tok/s

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.