Created bymario-alka.dePowered bynoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3-0.6B

Performance benchmark · measured on 12.11.2026 17:06

Benchmark-IDrun-20261112-163351-69bcce
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense0.6BRuntime: lmstudio-mlxQuantisierung: MLX 4bit
Generation189,50tok/s
Prefill11.437,88tok/s
Time to First Token250,50ms
Total duration17,50s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
189of 1927 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 90 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 189,5 tok/s
+145 % vs Ø 77,5
Prefill 11.437,9 tok/s
+302 % vs Ø 2.844,6
Time to First Token 251 ms
-99 % vs Ø 23.755
Distribution in the field0 – 471 tok/s
Ø 78 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: Keine GPU (CPU-only)
CPU: Apple M6 (unified CPU/GPU SoC, ARM64, AdvSIMD)
RAM: 24 GB
Mainboard: Apple Mac mini

Setup

Runtime: lmstudio-mlx
Quantization: MLX 4bit
Model: Qwen3-0.6B

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20261112-163351-69bcce
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-0.6B # Engine : lmstudio-mlx # Run-ID : run-20261112-163351-69bcce # GPU : Keine GPU (CPU-only) # CPU : Apple M6 (unified CPU/GPU SoC, ARM64, AdvSIMD) # RAM : 24 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ lmstudio-mlx \ --model qwen3-0.6b
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.lmstudio-mlx
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.8192
execution_typelocal

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3-0.6B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

69253437521759,0029.40558.81188.216Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 561,4 tok/s Generation, 20.958 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 573 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 - 503,3 tok/s Generation, 71.575 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 174 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 40...AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX - 495,5 tok/s Generation, 22.637 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 718 ms (8 Laufe)AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXAMD Oberon (PlayStation 5) - 302,6 tok/s Generation, 2.983 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.304 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Oberon (PlayStati...CPU-only - 189,5 tok/s Generation, 3.124 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 84.210 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ CPU-only
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 561,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 503,3 tok/sAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 495,5 tok/sAMD Oberon (PlayStation 5) 302,6 tok/s★ CPU-only 189,5 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

7295473651820,0019.12238.24457.366Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor - 561,4 tok/s Generation, 46.266 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 374 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Co...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores - 495,5 tok/s Generation, 27.231 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 657 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz - 480,5 tok/s Generation, 14.980 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 819 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Zen2 8-Core (PlayStation 5) - 302,6 tok/s Generation, 2.983 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.304 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Zen2 8-Core (Play...Apple M6 (unified CPU/GPU SoC) - 164,8 tok/s Generation, 7.014 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 390 ms (1 Lauf)Apple M6 (unified CPU...4 x Cortex-A78C + 4 x Cortex-A55 - 8,0 tok/s Generation, 90 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 132.604 ms (3 Laufe)4 x Cortex-A78C + 4 x...AMD Jaguar 8-Core (PlayStation 4) - 3,8 tok/s Generation, 23 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 106.805 ms (1 Lauf)AMD Jaguar 8-Core (Pl...Apple M6 (unified CPU/GPU SoC, ARM64, AdvSIMD) - 189,5 tok/s Generation, 11.438 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 251 ms (1 Lauf) | DIESER LAUF★ Apple M6 (unified CPU...
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor 561,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores 495,5 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 480,5 tok/sAMD Zen2 8-Core (PlayStation 5) 302,6 tok/s★ Apple M6 (unified CPU/GPU SoC, ARM64, AdvSIMD) 189,5 tok/s this runApple M6 (unified CPU/GPU SoC) 164,8 tok/s4 x Cortex-A78C + 4 x Cortex-A55 8,0 tok/sAMD Jaguar 8-Core (PlayStation 4) 3,8 tok/s

MBby mainboard

69253437521759,0029.52259.04488.565Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING - 561,4 tok/s Generation, 20.958 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 573 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) - 503,3 tok/s Generation, 71.575 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 174 ms (3 Laufe)Micro-Star Internatio...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 495,5 tok/s Generation, 27.231 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 657 ms (5 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 480,5 tok/s Generation, 14.980 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 819 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...unbekannt - 302,6 tok/s Generation, 1.043 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 84.871 ms (6 Laufe)unbekanntApple Mac mini - 189,5 tok/s Generation, 9.226 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 320 ms (2 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Apple Mac mini
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 561,4 tok/sMicro-Star International Co., Ltd. B550M PRO-VDH WIFI (MS-7C95) 503,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 495,5 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 480,5 tok/sunbekannt 302,6 tok/s★ Apple Mac mini 189,5 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

69753036319629,4021.47142.94164.412Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 561,4 tok/s Generation, 10.512 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 36.729 ms (14 Laufe)llama.cppvLLM - 503,3 tok/s Generation, 52.963 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 499 ms (6 Laufe)vLLMOllama - 164,8 tok/s Generation, 7.014 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 390 ms (1 Lauf)Ollamalmstudio-mlx - 189,5 tok/s Generation, 11.438 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 251 ms (1 Lauf) | DIESER LAUF★ lmstudio-mlx
llama.cpp 561,4 tok/svLLM 503,3 tok/s★ lmstudio-mlx 189,5 tok/s this runOllama 164,8 tok/s

DRVby driver

61859056153350520.65521.53422.41323.291Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 561,4 tok/s Generation, 21.973 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.539 ms (22 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 561,4 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🔌 Idle 0 W
⚡ TDP 10 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)0 W missing
Avg cost / hour–
Electricity / 1M tokens–
Token / kWh–
Acquisition (system)– partial price
Electricity (2 years)–
TCO (2 years)–
Output tokens (2 years)11.95B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)–
Savings vs. external (2 years)–
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (0 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3-0.6BKeine GPU (CPU-only)Qwen3-0.6BAMD Oberon (PlayStation 5)Qwen3-0.6BAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXQwen3-0.6BAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Electricity cost (24 mo.)––––
Acquisition cost––––
Total cost (TCO)––––
Generated tokens (24 mo.)––––
Token price via API––––
Break-even point (days)––––
Result (savings / extra cost)––––

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.