# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20261023-071744-de6331 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor # RAM : 31 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-qat-GGUF/snapshots/7b92b5b28818151e8669af2e45e88d6086f490dd/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-qat-UD-Q4_K_XL.gguf \ -c 16384 \ -np 12

Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.	llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.	Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.	16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.	/home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-qat-GGUF/snapshots/7b92b5b28818151e8669af2e45e88d6086f490dd/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-qat-UD-Q4_K_XL.gguf
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.	16384
np	12
execution_type	local

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Model comparison

Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.604,6 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.540,5 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.479,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.009,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 926,2 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 841,8 tok/sAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 315,5 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 247,3 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 79,5 tok/s

CPUby processor

★ AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 1.604,6 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.589,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.540,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.479,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1.009,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 926,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 841,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores 315,5 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 185,7 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 79,5 tok/s

MBby mainboard

★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.604,6 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.589,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.479,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1.009,0 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 926,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 397,2 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 185,7 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd SHWSA (MS-S1 MAX) 79,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

★ llama.cpp 1.604,6 tok/s this runvLLM 841,8 tok/sunbekannt 397,2 tok/s

DRVby driver

unbekannt 1.604,6 tok/sROCm 7.2.0 42,2 tok/s

💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URL Reset

⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh

⚙️ System utilization 100 %

🖥️ Acquisition EUR

🔌 Idle 42 W

⚡ TDP 612 W

☁️ External LLM (API) show

Input €/1M Output €/1M Input per output token

Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh

Avg power (incl. idle)612 W estimated (TDP)GPU 600 + Board 12 W full load

Avg cost / hourEUR 0.18

Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.032

Token / kWh9.44M

Acquisition (system)EUR 13,698 full priceGPU EUR 13,000 · CPU EUR 121 · Board EUR 149 · RAM EUR 248 · PSU EUR 180

Electricity (2 years)–

TCO (2 years)EUR 16,915

Output tokens (2 years)101.20B

☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison

External LLM cost (2 years)–

Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (42 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

	Gemma-4-26B-A4B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition	Gemma-4-26B-A4B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition	Gemma-4-26B-A4B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090	Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Acquisition cost	–	–	–	–
Total cost (TCO)	–	–	–	–
Generated tokens (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Token price via API	–	–	–	–
Break-even point (days)	–	–	–	–
Result (savings / extra cost)	–	–	–	–

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · this run 1,605 tok/s NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1,589 tok/s NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1,540 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1,480 tok/s

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.