Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503

Performance benchmark · measured on 02.09.2026 07:57

Benchmark-IDrun-20260902-060236-74d4bf
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: vLLMQuantisierung: AWQ
Generation89,30tok/s
Prefill4.368,02tok/s
Time to First Token9.029,00ms
Total duration248,77s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
44of 49 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 10 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 89,3 tok/s
-57 % vs Ø 208,6
Prefill 4.368,0 tok/s
+12 % vs Ø 3.899,5
Time to First Token 9.029 ms
-22 % vs Ø 11.605
Distribution in the field30 – 703 tok/s
Ø 209 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 2x AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 62 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: AWQ
Model: Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260902-060236-74d4bf
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260902-060236-74d4bf # GPU : 2x AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 62 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm serve \ --tensor-parallel-size 2 \ --max-model-len 16384 '(ROCm' gfx1100, 2x AMD Radeon Pro W7800 '48GB)'
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Tensor-Parallel?Anzahl GPUs, auf die JEDER einzelne Modell-Layer aufgeteilt wird (Tensor-Parallelitaet). Mehr GPUs = mehr VRAM und meist mehr Speed, aber die Anzahl der Attention-Heads muss durch diesen Wert teilbar sein (z.B. 32 Heads -> nur 1, 2, 4, 8 ... moeglich, NICHT 3).2
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
execution_typelocal

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

27520613768,60,003.4356.87110.306Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 214,9 tok/s Generation, 3.905 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.166 ms (27 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX - 170,1 tok/s Generation, 2.859 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.099 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTXAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 150,4 tok/s Generation, 1.883 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.173 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 133,1 tok/s Generation, 2.960 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.950 ms (19 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 31,3 tok/s Generation, 1.069 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.414 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB - 23,8 tok/s Generation, 218 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 30.869 ms (2 Laufe)NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCI...AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 141,9 tok/s Generation, 1.851 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.766 ms (7 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...
NVIDIA RTX A6000 214,9 tok/sAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 170,1 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 150,4 tok/s★ AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 141,9 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 133,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 88,3 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 31,3 tok/sNVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 23,8 tok/s

CPUby processor

27520613768,60,003.4356.87110.306Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 214,9 tok/s Generation, 3.589 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.702 ms (43 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz - 170,1 tok/s Generation, 3.446 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.020 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores - 151,5 tok/s Generation, 2.272 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.178 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor - 133,1 tok/s Generation, 2.443 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.785 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Co...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 31,3 tok/s Generation, 1.069 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.414 ms (2 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 23,8 tok/s Generation, 218 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 30.869 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 150,4 tok/s Generation, 1.871 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.023 ms (19 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 214,9 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 170,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores 151,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 150,4 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor 133,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 88,3 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 31,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 23,8 tok/s

MBby mainboard

27520613768,60,003.4356.87110.306Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 214,9 tok/s Generation, 3.589 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.702 ms (43 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 170,1 tok/s Generation, 3.446 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.020 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING - 133,1 tok/s Generation, 2.443 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.785 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd SHWSA (MS-S1 MAX) - 31,3 tok/s Generation, 1.069 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.414 ms (2 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) - 23,8 tok/s Generation, 218 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 30.869 ms (2 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 151,5 tok/s Generation, 1.926 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.771 ms (22 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 214,9 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 170,1 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 151,5 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 133,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 88,3 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd SHWSA (MS-S1 MAX) 31,3 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 23,8 tok/s

ENGby engine

27320513668,20,01.2033.0504.8976.744Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 214,9 tok/s Generation, 2.191 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.949 ms (52 Laufe)llama.cppunbekannt - 33,1 tok/s Generation, 3.057 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.231 ms (8 Laufe)unbekanntvLLM - 99,3 tok/s Generation, 5.757 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.550 ms (18 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 214,9 tok/s★ vLLM 99,3 tok/s this rununbekannt 33,1 tok/s

DRVby driver

27320513668,20,02.8613.0093.1563.303Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 214,9 tok/s Generation, 3.108 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.560 ms (70 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 33,1 tok/s Generation, 3.057 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.231 ms (8 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 214,9 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 33,1 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 530 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)530 W estimated (TDP)GPU 520 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.16
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.49
Token / kWh606.57K
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,172 partial priceGPU EUR 5,616 · CPU EUR 1,880 · RAM EUR 496 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)–
TCO (2 years)EUR 10,958
Output tokens (2 years)5.63B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)–
Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-25032x AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GBMistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-25032x NVIDIA RTX A6000Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-25032x NVIDIA RTX A6000Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-25032x NVIDIA RTX A6000
Electricity cost (24 mo.)––––
Acquisition cost––––
Total cost (TCO)––––
Generated tokens (24 mo.)––––
Token price via API––––
Break-even point (days)––––
Result (savings / extra cost)––––

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.