Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaPoolside

Laguna-XS-2.1

Performance benchmark · measured on 30.08.2026 01:16

Benchmark-IDrun-20260829-234039-3550ba
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Runtime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q8_0
Generation477,43tok/s
Prefill7.813,11tok/s
Time to First Token8.277,00ms
Total duration84,33s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
98of 300 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 68 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 477,4 tok/s
+16 % vs Ø 410,1
Prefill 7.813,1 tok/s
-36 % vs Ø 12.125,2
Time to First Token 8.277 ms
-6 % vs Ø 8.789
Distribution in the field32 – 1.568 tok/s
Ø 410 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 2x NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q8_0
Model: Laguna-XS-2.1

Anmerkung

NVLink installiert: 2x RTX A6000 ueber NVLink-Bridge (4x NVLink) verbunden.

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260829-234039-3550ba
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Laguna-XS-2.1 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260829-234039-3550ba # GPU : 2x NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m Laguna-XS-2.1-Q8_0.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 32768 \ -np 8 \ -sm layer '(2x' RTX A6000 48GB 'NVLink)'
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.32768
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.Laguna-XS-2.1-Q8_0.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.32768
np8
Split-Mode?Verteilung ueber mehrere GPUs: none (nur eine GPU), layer (Layer aufteilen) oder row (Tensoren zeilenweise).layer

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Laguna-XS-2.1 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.2641.6981.1325660,006.70913.41820.128Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 7.330 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.704 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.757,4 tok/s Generation, 7.536 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.531 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.629,9 tok/s Generation, 9.102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.884 ms (33 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 986,1 tok/s Generation, 4.490 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.230 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 319,0 tok/s Generation, 1.367 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.939 ms (15 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 154,3 tok/s Generation, 2.121 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 57.550 ms (13 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 836,4 tok/s Generation, 16.430 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.022 ms (27 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.765,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.757,4 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.629,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 986,1 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 836,4 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 319,0 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 154,3 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.2311.6731.1155580,004.7879.57414.361Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 7.330 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.704 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.757,4 tok/s Generation, 7.536 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.531 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.629,9 tok/s Generation, 9.102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.884 ms (33 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 986,1 tok/s Generation, 4.490 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.230 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 319,0 tok/s Generation, 1.367 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.939 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 836,4 tok/s Generation, 11.780 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.069 ms (40 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.765,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.757,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.629,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 986,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 836,4 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 319,0 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.2311.6731.1155580,004.2878.57312.860Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 7.330 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.704 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.757,4 tok/s Generation, 7.536 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.531 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 986,1 tok/s Generation, 4.490 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.230 ms (9 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 319,0 tok/s Generation, 1.367 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.939 ms (15 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.629,9 tok/s Generation, 10.569 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.752 ms (73 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.765,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.757,4 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.629,9 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 986,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 319,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.2891.7171.1455720,007.78115.56223.343Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 836,4 tok/s Generation, 19.361 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.004 ms (21 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 26,9 tok/s Generation, 3.698 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 748 ms (1 Lauf)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 5.978 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.939 ms (93 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.765,0 tok/s this runvLLM 836,4 tok/sunbekannt 26,9 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.2891.7171.1455720,02.3374.8267.3159.804Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.765,0 tok/s Generation, 8.443 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.372 ms (114 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 26,9 tok/s Generation, 3.698 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 748 ms (1 Lauf)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 1.765,0 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 26,9 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 95 W
⚡ TDP 671 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)671 W estimated (TDP)GPU 600 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.20
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.12
Token / kWh2.56M
Acquisition (system)EUR 11,454 full priceGPU EUR 6,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 14,981
Output tokens (2 years)30.11B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (95 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Laguna-XS-2.12x NVIDIA RTX A6000Laguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Laguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLaguna-XS-2.1NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.