Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

Nemotron-3-Nano-4B

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.08.2026 11:47

Benchmark-IDrun-20260829-095458-86d0b5
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense4BRuntime: vLLMQuantisierung: FP8
Generation899,41tok/s
Prefill30.214,25tok/s
Time to First Token472,50ms
Total duration12,37s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
50of 1097 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 96 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 899,4 tok/s
+237 % vs Ø 267,1
Prefill 30.214,3 tok/s
+492 % vs Ø 5.104,4
Time to First Token 473 ms
-99 % vs Ø 32.924
Distribution in the field0 – 1.349 tok/s
Ø 267 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-0adf6d
1.349,3 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-5b4937
1.301,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B same modelNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-30d864
1.188,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B same modelNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-5432cd
1.164,8 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-9e81f9
1.136,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-09627f
1.135,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-058a31
1.113,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B same model3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B same model3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B same model3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B same model3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-305ad6
1.007,8 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B this run2× NVIDIA RTX A6000 · run-20260829-095458-86d0b5
899,4 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 2x NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: FP8
Model: Nemotron-3-Nano-4B

Anmerkung

NVLink installiert: 2x RTX A6000 ueber NVLink-Bridge (4x NVLink) verbunden.

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260829-095458-86d0b5
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Nemotron-3-Nano-4B # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260829-095458-86d0b5 # GPU : 2x NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm \ --tensor-parallel-size 2 \ --max-model-len 16384 '(2x' RTX A6000 48GB 'NVLink)'
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Tensor-Parallel?Anzahl GPUs, auf die JEDER einzelne Modell-Layer aufgeteilt wird (Tensor-Parallelitaet). Mehr GPUs = mehr VRAM und meist mehr Speed, aber die Anzahl der Attention-Heads muss durch diesen Wert teilbar sein (z.B. 32 Heads -> nur 1, 2, 4, 8 ... moeglich, NICHT 3).2
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Nemotron-3-Nano-4B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.8122.1091.4067030,005.89311.78617.679Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 2.182,7 tok/s Generation, 8.013 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.717 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.937,7 tok/s Generation, 7.627 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.077 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.878,7 tok/s Generation, 5.348 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.511 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 1.197,0 tok/s Generation, 4.606 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.936 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 992,1 tok/s Generation, 5.129 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.537 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 667,0 tok/s Generation, 3.839 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.280 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 367,8 tok/s Generation, 2.933 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.303 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 125,7 tok/s Generation, 1.062 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.388 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 1.485,1 tok/s Generation, 14.412 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.383 ms (12 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 2.182,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.937,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.878,7 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 1.485,1 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.197,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 992,1 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 667,0 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 367,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 125,7 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.8362.1271.4187090,003.9677.93411.900Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 2.182,7 tok/s Generation, 8.013 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.717 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.937,7 tok/s Generation, 7.627 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.077 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.878,7 tok/s Generation, 5.348 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.511 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 1.197,0 tok/s Generation, 4.606 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.936 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 992,1 tok/s Generation, 5.129 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.537 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...NVIDIA Grace - 367,8 tok/s Generation, 2.933 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.303 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GraceIntel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz - 125,7 tok/s Generation, 1.395 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.754 ms (9 Laufe)Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 8,0 tok/s Generation, 63 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 139.289 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 1.485,1 tok/s Generation, 9.606 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.063 ms (22 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 2.182,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.937,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.878,7 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 1.485,1 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1.197,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 992,1 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 367,8 tok/sIntel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz 125,7 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 8,0 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.8362.1271.4187090,003.6787.35611.034Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 2.182,7 tok/s Generation, 8.013 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.717 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.878,7 tok/s Generation, 5.348 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.511 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 1.197,0 tok/s Generation, 4.606 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.936 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 992,1 tok/s Generation, 5.129 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.537 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 367,8 tok/s Generation, 2.933 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.303 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ - 125,7 tok/s Generation, 1.395 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.754 ms (9 Laufe)ASRock H110 Pro BTC+Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 8,0 tok/s Generation, 63 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 139.289 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.937,7 tok/s Generation, 8.908 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.715 ms (34 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 2.182,7 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.937,7 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.878,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1.197,0 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 992,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 367,8 tok/sASRock H110 Pro BTC+ 125,7 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 8,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.5402.1871.8341.4811.12709.62719.25328.880Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 2.182,7 tok/s Generation, 4.463 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.921 ms (58 Laufe)llama.cppvLLM - 1.485,1 tok/s Generation, 23.938 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 583 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 2.182,7 tok/s★ vLLM 1.485,1 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

2.7642.0731.3826910,01.8683.8125.7567.701Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 2.182,7 tok/s Generation, 6.636 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.605 ms (58 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 367,8 tok/s Generation, 2.933 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.303 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...
unbekannt 2.182,7 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 367,8 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 95 W
⚡ TDP 671 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)671 W estimated (TDP)GPU 600 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.20
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.062
Token / kWh4.83M
Acquisition (system)EUR 11,454 full priceGPU EUR 6,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 14,981
Output tokens (2 years)56.73B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (95 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Nemotron-3-Nano-4B2x NVIDIA RTX A6000Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.