Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Magistral-Small-2509

Performance benchmark · measured on 27.08.2026 02:27

Benchmark-IDrun-20260827-003159-4fa318
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: vLLMQuantisierung: AWQ
Generation168,52tok/s
Prefill4.153,63tok/s
Time to First Token3.278,00ms
Total duration67,15s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
464of 944 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 51 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 168,5 tok/s
-37 % vs Ø 267,2
Prefill 4.153,6 tok/s
-4 % vs Ø 4.318,3
Time to First Token 3.278 ms
-91 % vs Ø 37.736
Distribution in the field0 – 1.349 tok/s
Ø 267 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-0adf6d
1.349,3 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-5b4937
1.301,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-30d864
1.188,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-5432cd
1.164,8 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-9e81f9
1.136,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-09627f
1.135,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-058a31
1.113,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-305ad6
1.007,8 tok/s
Magistral-Small-2509 this runNVIDIA RTX A6000 · run-20260827-003159-4fa318
168,5 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: AWQ
Model: Magistral-Small-2509

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260827-003159-4fa318
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Magistral-Small-2509 # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260827-003159-4fa318 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm serve \ --model Magistral-Small-2509
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Magistral-Small-2509

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Magistral-Small-2509 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

9537154772380,001.6063.2124.817Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 128 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.689 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 726,9 tok/s Generation, 3.891 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.194 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 637,2 tok/s Generation, 149 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.798 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 353,8 tok/s Generation, 1.856 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.508 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 230,0 tok/s Generation, 910 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.435 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 159,0 tok/s Generation, 78 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.931 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 141,7 tok/s Generation, 1.590 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.535 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...Intel Arc Pro B70 - 37,9 tok/s Generation, 43 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 65.064 ms (3 Laufe)Intel Arc Pro B70NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB - 24,7 tok/s Generation, 189 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.758 ms (2 Laufe)NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCI...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 278,1 tok/s Generation, 2.591 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.179 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 737,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 726,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 637,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 353,8 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 278,1 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 230,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 159,0 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 141,7 tok/sIntel Arc Pro B70 37,9 tok/sNVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 24,7 tok/s

CPUby processor

9507134752380,001.6023.2054.807Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 128 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.689 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 726,9 tok/s Generation, 3.891 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.194 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 637,2 tok/s Generation, 149 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.798 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 353,8 tok/s Generation, 1.856 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.508 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 159,0 tok/s Generation, 1.288 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.214 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 37,9 tok/s Generation, 102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 53.342 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 278,1 tok/s Generation, 1.540 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.964 ms (24 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 737,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 726,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 637,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 353,8 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 278,1 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 159,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 37,9 tok/s

MBby mainboard

9537154772380,001.6063.2124.817Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 128 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.689 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 726,9 tok/s Generation, 3.891 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.194 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 353,8 tok/s Generation, 1.856 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.508 ms (6 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 159,0 tok/s Generation, 1.288 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.214 ms (15 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) - 37,9 tok/s Generation, 43 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 65.064 ms (3 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) - 24,7 tok/s Generation, 189 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.758 ms (2 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 637,2 tok/s Generation, 1.077 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.242 ms (36 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 737,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 726,9 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 637,2 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 353,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 159,0 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 37,9 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 24,7 tok/s

ENGby engine

9527144762380,001.9593.9175.876Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 764 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.375 ms (59 Laufe)llama.cppunbekannt - 28,9 tok/s Generation, 1.586 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.672 ms (3 Laufe)unbekanntvLLM - 726,9 tok/s Generation, 4.850 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.083 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 737,0 tok/s★ vLLM 726,9 tok/s this rununbekannt 28,9 tok/s

DRVby driver

9527144762380,006531.3061.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 737,0 tok/s Generation, 1.363 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.842 ms (65 Laufe)unbekanntIntel 26.18.38308.4 - 37,9 tok/s Generation, 43 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 65.064 ms (3 Laufe)Intel 26.18.38308.4AMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 28,9 tok/s Generation, 1.586 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.672 ms (3 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 737,0 tok/sIntel 26.18.38308.4 37,9 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 28,9 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 65 W
⚡ TDP 71 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.035
Token / kWh8.54M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,394 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,767
Output tokens (2 years)10.63B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Magistral-Small-2509NVIDIA RTX A6000Magistral-Small-2509NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMagistral-Small-2509NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMagistral-Small-2509NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.