Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Performance benchmark · measured on 27.08.2026 00:53

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-232724-7f18e1
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE35BRuntime: vLLMQuantisierung: AWQ
Generation292,62tok/s
Prefill14.088,29tok/s
Time to First Token779,50ms
Total duration36,63s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
16of 96 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 84 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 292,6 tok/s
+37 % vs Ø 214,0
Prefill 14.088,3 tok/s
+79 % vs Ø 7.854,5
Time to First Token 780 ms
-75 % vs Ø 3.074
Distribution in the field24 – 632 tok/s
Ø 214 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: AWQ
Model: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-232724-7f18e1
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3.5-35B-A3B # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260826-232724-7f18e1 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm serve \ --model Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.9671.4759844920,005.26410.52815.792Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.520,4 tok/s Generation, 12.809 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.176 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.416,7 tok/s Generation, 5.541 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.907 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.398,4 tok/s Generation, 6.870 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.115 ms (11 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 866,1 tok/s Generation, 3.371 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.651 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 220,5 tok/s Generation, 2.194 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.070 ms (27 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 212,5 tok/s Generation, 2.015 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.888 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 142,2 tok/s Generation, 508 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.910 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 46,9 tok/s Generation, 3.713 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 537 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 446,8 tok/s Generation, 8.621 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.612 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.520,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.416,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.398,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 866,1 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 446,8 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 220,5 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 212,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 142,2 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 46,9 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.9671.4759844920,005.20410.40715.611Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.520,4 tok/s Generation, 12.809 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.176 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.416,7 tok/s Generation, 5.541 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.907 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.398,4 tok/s Generation, 6.870 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.115 ms (11 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 866,1 tok/s Generation, 3.371 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.651 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 212,5 tok/s Generation, 1.513 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.562 ms (18 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...NVIDIA Grace - 46,9 tok/s Generation, 3.713 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 537 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA GraceAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 446,8 tok/s Generation, 3.362 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.805 ms (33 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.520,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.416,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.398,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 866,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 446,8 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 212,5 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 46,9 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.9671.4759844920,005.20410.40715.611Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.520,4 tok/s Generation, 12.809 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.176 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.416,7 tok/s Generation, 5.541 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.907 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 866,1 tok/s Generation, 3.371 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.651 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 212,5 tok/s Generation, 1.513 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.562 ms (18 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 46,9 tok/s Generation, 3.713 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 537 ms (1 Lauf)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.398,4 tok/s Generation, 4.239 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.632 ms (44 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.520,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.416,7 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.398,4 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 866,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 212,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 46,9 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.9611.4719804900,01.1174.0516.9859.919Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.520,4 tok/s Generation, 3.401 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.242 ms (56 Laufe)llama.cppunbekannt - 78,5 tok/s Generation, 2.652 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 858 ms (5 Laufe)unbekanntvLLM - 1.028,6 tok/s Generation, 8.384 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.954 ms (14 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 1.520,4 tok/s★ vLLM 1.028,6 tok/s this rununbekannt 78,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.9671.4759844920,02.0713.0434.0154.988Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.520,4 tok/s Generation, 4.407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.991 ms (69 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 78,5 tok/s Generation, 2.652 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 858 ms (5 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-genericNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 46,9 tok/s Generation, 3.713 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 537 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...
unbekannt 1.520,4 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 78,5 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 46,9 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 65 W
⚡ TDP 71 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.020
Token / kWh14.84M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,394 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,767
Output tokens (2 years)18.46B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3.5-35B-A3BNVIDIA RTX A6000Qwen3.5-35B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3.5-35B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3.5-35B-A3B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.