Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaCohere

North-Mini-Code-1.0

Performance benchmark · measured on 26.08.2026 23:24

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-215014-73ceb3
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Runtime: vLLMQuantisierung: AWQ
Generation356,91tok/s
Prefill23.191,01tok/s
Time to First Token1.189,50ms
Total duration59,99s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
29of 86 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 67 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 356,9 tok/s
+14 % vs Ø 311,9
Prefill 23.191,0 tok/s
+146 % vs Ø 9.445,5
Time to First Token 1.190 ms
-82 % vs Ø 6.492
Distribution in the field32 – 1.123 tok/s
Ø 312 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: AWQ
Model: North-Mini-Code-1.0

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-215014-73ceb3
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : North-Mini-Code-1.0 # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260826-215014-73ceb3 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm serve \ --model North-Mini-Code-1.0
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.North-Mini-Code-1.0

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

North-Mini-Code-1.0 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1061.5801.0535270,006.71713.43320.150Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.557,3 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.954 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.492,4 tok/s Generation, 8.535 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.497 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 169,0 tok/s Generation, 890 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.856 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 131,9 tok/s Generation, 1.759 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.043 ms (1 Lauf)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 87,3 tok/s Generation, 502 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 82.917 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...CPU-only - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyNVIDIA RTX A6000 - 356,9 tok/s Generation, 16.263 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 709 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.621,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.557,3 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.492,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 939,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 356,9 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 169,0 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 131,9 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 87,3 tok/sCPU-only 5,1 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.1061.5801.0535270,003.5227.04510.567Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.557,3 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.954 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.492,4 tok/s Generation, 8.535 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.497 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 169,0 tok/s Generation, 890 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.856 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 131,9 tok/s Generation, 1.759 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.043 ms (1 Lauf)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 356,9 tok/s Generation, 4.139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 63.946 ms (13 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.621,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.557,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.492,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 939,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 356,9 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 169,0 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 131,9 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 5,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.1061.5801.0535270,002.5785.1557.733Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 6.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.593 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.557,3 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.954 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 939,5 tok/s Generation, 4.130 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.948 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 169,0 tok/s Generation, 890 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.856 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 131,9 tok/s Generation, 1.759 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.043 ms (1 Lauf)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 5,1 tok/s Generation, 89 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 113.797 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.492,4 tok/s Generation, 6.249 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 34.930 ms (25 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.621,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.557,3 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.492,4 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 939,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 169,0 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 131,9 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 5,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.0361.5271.0185090,01.0817.18913.29719.406Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 4.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 35.832 ms (38 Laufe)llama.cppvLLM - 356,9 tok/s Generation, 16.263 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 709 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 1.621,0 tok/s★ vLLM 356,9 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

1.7831.7021.6211.5401.4594.7985.0025.2075.411Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.621,0 tok/s Generation, 5.104 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 33.262 ms (41 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.621,0 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 65 W
⚡ TDP 71 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.017
Token / kWh18.10M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,394 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,767
Output tokens (2 years)22.51B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

North-Mini-Code-1.0NVIDIA RTX A6000North-Mini-Code-1.0NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNorth-Mini-Code-1.0NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090North-Mini-Code-1.03x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.