Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 26.08.2026 23:06

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-211812-f1128b
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: vLLMQuantisierung: AWQ
Generation315,88tok/s
Prefill16.869,85tok/s
Time to First Token840,50ms
Total duration34,19s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
13of 85 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 86 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 315,9 tok/s
+47 % vs Ø 215,4
Prefill 16.869,9 tok/s
+131 % vs Ø 7.313,7
Time to First Token 841 ms
-74 % vs Ø 3.259
Distribution in the field24 – 632 tok/s
Ø 215 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: AWQ
Model: Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-211812-f1128b
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260826-211812-f1128b # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm serve \ --model Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1351.6011.0675340,006.96613.93220.898Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.329 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.639,0 tok/s Generation, 17.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.966 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.505,0 tok/s Generation, 12.905 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.350 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 903,5 tok/s Generation, 5.934 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.817 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 245,1 tok/s Generation, 4.091 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.139 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 154,0 tok/s Generation, 1.182 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 22.532 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 3.530 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 44.809 ms (20 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 440,0 tok/s Generation, 10.880 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.357 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.655,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.639,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.505,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 903,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 440,0 tok/s this runAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 245,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 154,0 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 89,8 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.1041.5781.0525260,006.87913.75720.636Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.329 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.639,0 tok/s Generation, 17.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.966 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.505,0 tok/s Generation, 12.905 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.350 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 903,5 tok/s Generation, 5.934 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.817 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 245,1 tok/s Generation, 2.636 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.836 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 440,0 tok/s Generation, 5.811 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.324 ms (29 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.655,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.639,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.505,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 903,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 440,0 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 245,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.1041.5781.0525260,006.87913.75720.636Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.329 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.639,0 tok/s Generation, 17.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.966 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 903,5 tok/s Generation, 5.934 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.817 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 245,1 tok/s Generation, 2.636 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.836 ms (12 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.505,0 tok/s Generation, 7.491 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.698 ms (38 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.655,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.639,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.505,0 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 903,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 245,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.1351.6011.0675340,04.0257.0039.98012.957Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 6.611 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.888 ms (42 Laufe)llama.cppunbekannt - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 5.705 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 549 ms (7 Laufe)unbekanntvLLM - 1.028,5 tok/s Generation, 11.278 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.129 ms (13 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 1.655,9 tok/s★ vLLM 1.028,5 tok/s this rununbekannt 89,8 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.1351.6011.0675340,04.8816.1007.3198.539Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 7.714 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.508 ms (55 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 5.705 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 549 ms (7 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 1.655,9 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 89,8 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 65 W
⚡ TDP 71 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.019
Token / kWh16.02M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,394 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,767
Output tokens (2 years)19.92B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA RTX A6000Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.