Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B

Performance benchmark · measured on 26.08.2026 23:00

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-211812-3aa2ec
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: vLLMQuantisierung: AWQ
Generation419,41tok/s
Prefill14.675,59tok/s
Time to First Token885,00ms
Total duration26,22s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
5of 85 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 95 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 419,4 tok/s
+95 % vs Ø 215,4
Prefill 14.675,6 tok/s
+101 % vs Ø 7.313,7
Time to First Token 885 ms
-73 % vs Ø 3.259
Distribution in the field24 – 632 tok/s
Ø 215 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: AWQ
Model: Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-211812-3aa2ec
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260826-211812-3aa2ec # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm serve \ --model NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.3041.7281.1525760,003.8617.72211.583Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 9.352 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.935 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.722,1 tok/s Generation, 5.965 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.591 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.654,6 tok/s Generation, 8.091 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.398 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 897,5 tok/s Generation, 3.945 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.691 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 263,3 tok/s Generation, 688 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.273 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 217,4 tok/s Generation, 3.127 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.253 ms (28 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 58,3 tok/s Generation, 5.466 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 395 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...CPU-only - 6,6 tok/s Generation, 72 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.051 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyNVIDIA RTX A6000 - 588,5 tok/s Generation, 7.870 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.737 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.773,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.722,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.654,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 897,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 588,5 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 263,3 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 217,4 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 58,3 tok/sCPU-only 6,6 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.3041.7281.1525760,003.8617.72211.583Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 9.352 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.935 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.722,1 tok/s Generation, 5.965 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.591 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.654,6 tok/s Generation, 8.091 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.398 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 897,5 tok/s Generation, 3.908 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.463 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 404,7 tok/s Generation, 3.981 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.919 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 263,3 tok/s Generation, 688 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.273 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...NVIDIA Grace - 58,3 tok/s Generation, 5.466 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 395 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA GraceIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 6,6 tok/s Generation, 72 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.051 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 588,5 tok/s Generation, 4.281 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.533 ms (37 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.773,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.722,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.654,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 897,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 588,5 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 404,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 263,3 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 58,3 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 6,6 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.3041.7281.1525760,003.8617.72211.583Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 9.352 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.935 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.722,1 tok/s Generation, 5.965 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.591 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 897,5 tok/s Generation, 3.908 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.463 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 404,7 tok/s Generation, 3.981 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.919 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 263,3 tok/s Generation, 688 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.273 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 58,3 tok/s Generation, 5.466 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 395 ms (1 Lauf)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 6,6 tok/s Generation, 72 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.051 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.654,6 tok/s Generation, 5.026 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.376 ms (46 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.773,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.722,1 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.654,6 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 897,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 404,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 263,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 58,3 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 6,6 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.2251.6681.1125560,01.5185.7429.96714.191Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 3.724 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 22.942 ms (55 Laufe)llama.cppunbekannt - 404,7 tok/s Generation, 3.981 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.919 ms (3 Laufe)unbekanntvLLM - 588,5 tok/s Generation, 11.985 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.459 ms (10 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 1.773,5 tok/s★ vLLM 588,5 tok/s this rununbekannt 404,7 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.2941.7201.1475730,04.5204.9765.4325.888Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 4.943 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.176 ms (67 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 58,3 tok/s Generation, 5.466 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 395 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...
unbekannt 1.773,5 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 58,3 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 65 W
⚡ TDP 71 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.014
Token / kWh21.27M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,394 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,767
Output tokens (2 years)26.45B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX A6000Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.