Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503

Performance benchmark · measured on 26.08.2026 22:29

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-204554-472c48
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: vLLMQuantisierung: AWQ
Generation24,14tok/s
Prefill4.232,12tok/s
Time to First Token3.475,00ms
Total duration432,09s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
87of 87 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 0 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 24,1 tok/s
-89 % vs Ø 216,0
Prefill 4.232,1 tok/s
-44 % vs Ø 7.495,7
Time to First Token 3.475 ms
+8 % vs Ø 3.204
Distribution in the field24 – 632 tok/s
Ø 216 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: AWQ
Model: Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-204554-472c48
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260826-204554-472c48 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm serve \ --model Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

20315210250,80,003.4356.87110.306Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 150,4 tok/s Generation, 1.883 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.173 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 33,1 tok/s Generation, 3.057 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.231 ms (16 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 31,3 tok/s Generation, 1.069 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.414 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB - 23,8 tok/s Generation, 218 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 30.869 ms (2 Laufe)NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCI...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 159,9 tok/s Generation, 3.015 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.368 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 159,9 tok/s this runAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 150,4 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 88,3 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 33,1 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 31,3 tok/sNVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 23,8 tok/s

CPUby processor

20315210250,80,003.4356.87110.306Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 150,4 tok/s Generation, 1.883 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.173 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 31,3 tok/s Generation, 1.069 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.414 ms (2 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 23,8 tok/s Generation, 218 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 30.869 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 159,9 tok/s Generation, 3.042 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.360 ms (25 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 159,9 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 150,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 88,3 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 31,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 23,8 tok/s

MBby mainboard

20315210250,80,003.4356.87110.306Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 150,4 tok/s Generation, 1.883 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.173 ms (12 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 31,3 tok/s Generation, 1.069 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.414 ms (2 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) - 23,8 tok/s Generation, 218 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 30.869 ms (2 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 159,9 tok/s Generation, 3.042 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.360 ms (25 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 159,9 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 150,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 88,3 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 31,3 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 23,8 tok/s

ENGby engine

20115110150,30,07242.8054.8866.968Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 159,9 tok/s Generation, 1.810 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.867 ms (27 Laufe)llama.cppunbekannt - 33,1 tok/s Generation, 3.057 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.231 ms (8 Laufe)unbekanntvLLM - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 5.882 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.927 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 159,9 tok/s★ vLLM 88,3 tok/s this rununbekannt 33,1 tok/s

DRVby driver

20115110150,30,02.6032.8293.0553.282Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 159,9 tok/s Generation, 2.828 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.132 ms (36 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 33,1 tok/s Generation, 3.057 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.231 ms (8 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 159,9 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 33,1 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 65 W
⚡ TDP 71 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.25
Token / kWh1.22M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,394 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,767
Output tokens (2 years)1.52B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503NVIDIA RTX A6000Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual SlotMistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503NVIDIA RTX A6000Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-25032x AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.