Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaDeepReinforce

Ornith-1.0-9B

Performance benchmark · measured on 26.08.2026 21:27

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-194154-14e588
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense9BRuntime: vLLMQuantisierung: AWQ
Generation85,35tok/s
Prefill5.376,44tok/s
Time to First Token358,50ms
Total duration24,71s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
50of 83 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 40 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 85,4 tok/s
-10 % vs Ø 94,7
Prefill 5.376,4 tok/s
+21 % vs Ø 4.441,6
Time to First Token 359 ms
-52 % vs Ø 743
Distribution in the field5 – 194 tok/s
Ø 95 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: AWQ
Model: Ornith-1.0-9B

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-194154-14e588
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Ornith-1.0-9B # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260826-194154-14e588 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm serve \ --model Ornith-1.0-9B
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Ornith-1.0-9B

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Ornith-1.0-9B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.0161.5121.0085040,003.7057.41111.116Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.560,5 tok/s Generation, 9.057 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.092 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.505,6 tok/s Generation, 6.762 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.486 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.349,7 tok/s Generation, 7.752 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.646 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 883,4 tok/s Generation, 4.525 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.715 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 786,2 tok/s Generation, 4.419 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.463 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 487,6 tok/s Generation, 4.273 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.436 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...Intel Arc Pro B70 - 351,6 tok/s Generation, 1.049 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.609 ms (5 Laufe)Intel Arc Pro B70AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 235,1 tok/s Generation, 2.629 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.778 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 108,0 tok/s Generation, 1.606 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.161 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB - 64,5 tok/s Generation, 638 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.496 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCI...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 611,4 tok/s Generation, 6.371 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.878 ms (12 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.560,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.505,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.349,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 883,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 786,2 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 611,4 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 487,6 tok/sIntel Arc Pro B70 351,6 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 235,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 108,0 tok/sNVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 64,5 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.0071.5051.0045020,003.6907.38011.070Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.560,5 tok/s Generation, 9.057 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.092 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.505,6 tok/s Generation, 6.762 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.486 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.349,7 tok/s Generation, 7.752 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.646 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 883,4 tok/s Generation, 3.577 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.746 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 786,2 tok/s Generation, 4.419 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.463 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 351,6 tok/s Generation, 895 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.691 ms (8 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz - 108,0 tok/s Generation, 1.606 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.161 ms (6 Laufe)Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 611,4 tok/s Generation, 5.472 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.117 ms (21 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.560,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.505,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.349,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 883,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 786,2 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 611,4 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 351,6 tok/sIntel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz 108,0 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.0161.5121.0085040,003.7057.41111.116Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.560,5 tok/s Generation, 9.057 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.092 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.505,6 tok/s Generation, 6.762 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.486 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 883,4 tok/s Generation, 3.577 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.746 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 786,2 tok/s Generation, 4.419 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.463 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) - 351,6 tok/s Generation, 1.049 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.609 ms (5 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ - 108,0 tok/s Generation, 1.606 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.161 ms (6 Laufe)ASRock H110 Pro BTC+Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) - 64,5 tok/s Generation, 638 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.496 ms (3 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.349,7 tok/s Generation, 6.156 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.675 ms (30 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.560,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.505,6 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.349,7 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 883,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 786,2 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 351,6 tok/sASRock H110 Pro BTC+ 108,0 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 64,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.9061.4961.0866762663.0075.4047.80110.198Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.560,5 tok/s Generation, 4.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.457 ms (53 Laufe)llama.cppvLLM - 611,4 tok/s Generation, 8.856 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.191 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 1.560,5 tok/s★ vLLM 611,4 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

1.9581.4699794900,012.0684.1366.204Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.560,5 tok/s Generation, 5.156 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.450 ms (54 Laufe)unbekanntIntel 26.18.38308.4 - 351,6 tok/s Generation, 1.049 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 21.609 ms (5 Laufe)Intel 26.18.38308.4
unbekannt 1.560,5 tok/sIntel 26.18.38308.4 351,6 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 65 W
⚡ TDP 71 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.069
Token / kWh4.33M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,394 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,767
Output tokens (2 years)5.38B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Ornith-1.0-9BNVIDIA RTX A6000Ornith-1.0-9BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Ornith-1.0-9BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionOrnith-1.0-9B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.