Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 26.08.2026 17:03

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-152551-654b8e
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense32BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation65,64tok/s
Prefill1.574,09tok/s
Time to First Token8.127,50ms
Total duration180,23s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
615of 899 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 32 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 65,6 tok/s
-76 % vs Ø 268,0
Prefill 1.574,1 tok/s
-60 % vs Ø 3.953,1
Time to First Token 8.128 ms
-79 % vs Ø 39.529
Distribution in the field0 – 1.349 tok/s
Ø 268 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-0adf6d
1.349,3 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-5b4937
1.301,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-30d864
1.188,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-5432cd
1.164,8 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-9e81f9
1.136,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-09627f
1.135,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-058a31
1.113,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-305ad6
1.007,8 tok/s
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct this runNVIDIA RTX A6000 · run-20260826-152551-654b8e
65,6 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-152551-654b8e
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260826-152551-654b8e # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 49152 \ -np 12
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.49152
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.49152
np12

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

6474853231620,001.8153.6295.444Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 500,6 tok/s Generation, 4.446 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.330 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 479,6 tok/s Generation, 4.242 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.075 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 412,8 tok/s Generation, 4.476 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.913 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 236,4 tok/s Generation, 2.040 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.899 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 102,1 tok/s Generation, 1.068 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.870 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 45,3 tok/s Generation, 587 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.842 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 21,2 tok/s Generation, 2.649 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 50.284 ms (27 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 116,0 tok/s Generation, 1.465 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.067 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 500,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 479,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 412,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 236,4 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 116,0 tok/s this runAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 102,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 45,3 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 21,2 tok/s

CPUby processor

6304733151580,0731.8403.6075.375Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 500,6 tok/s Generation, 4.446 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.330 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 479,6 tok/s Generation, 4.242 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.075 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 412,8 tok/s Generation, 4.476 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.913 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 236,4 tok/s Generation, 2.040 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.899 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 102,1 tok/s Generation, 972 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 30.264 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 116,0 tok/s Generation, 2.531 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 46.162 ms (30 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 500,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 479,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 412,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 236,4 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 116,0 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 102,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

6304733151580,0801.8323.5855.338Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 500,6 tok/s Generation, 4.446 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.330 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 479,6 tok/s Generation, 4.242 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.075 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 236,4 tok/s Generation, 2.040 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.899 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 102,1 tok/s Generation, 972 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 30.264 ms (15 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 412,8 tok/s Generation, 2.980 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 38.259 ms (39 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 500,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 479,6 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 412,8 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 236,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 102,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

6474853231620,01.1372.7504.3645.977Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 500,6 tok/s Generation, 5.111 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.247 ms (9 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 21,2 tok/s Generation, 3.615 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.812 ms (10 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 479,6 tok/s Generation, 2.003 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 43.566 ms (47 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
vLLM 500,6 tok/s★ llama.cpp 479,6 tok/s this rununbekannt 21,2 tok/s

DRVby driver

6474853231620,02.0862.7343.3834.032Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 500,6 tok/s Generation, 2.503 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 36.765 ms (56 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 21,2 tok/s Generation, 3.615 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.812 ms (10 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 500,6 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 21,2 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 65 W
⚡ TDP 71 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.090
Token / kWh3.33M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,394 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,767
Output tokens (2 years)4.14B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructNVIDIA RTX A6000Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.