Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning

Performance benchmark · measured on 26.08.2026 14:52

Benchmark-IDrun-20260826-131708-629830
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation200,96tok/s
Prefill4.633,58tok/s
Time to First Token2.320,50ms
Total duration56,15s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
20of 51 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 62 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 201,0 tok/s
+7 % vs Ø 187,1
Prefill 4.633,6 tok/s
-12 % vs Ø 5.287,4
Time to First Token 2.321 ms
-24 % vs Ø 3.051
Distribution in the field57 – 463 tok/s
Ø 187 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA RTX A6000 · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260826-131708-629830
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260826-131708-629830 # GPU : NVIDIA RTX A6000 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-UD-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 49152 \ -np 12
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.49152
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-UD-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.49152
np12

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.3041.7281.1525760,003.3096.6189.927Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.053 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.537 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.706,7 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.614 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.651,0 tok/s Generation, 8.080 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.410 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 896,6 tok/s Generation, 3.860 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.490 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 262,5 tok/s Generation, 700 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.130 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 122,4 tok/s Generation, 510 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 64.956 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 229,0 tok/s Generation, 4.725 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.314 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX A6000
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.791,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.706,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.651,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 896,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 262,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX A6000 229,0 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 122,4 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.2831.7121.1425710,003.2986.5959.893Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.053 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.537 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.706,7 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.614 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.651,0 tok/s Generation, 8.080 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.410 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 896,6 tok/s Generation, 3.860 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.490 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 262,5 tok/s Generation, 700 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.130 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 229,0 tok/s Generation, 2.091 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.465 ms (16 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.791,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.706,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.651,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 896,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 262,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 229,0 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

2.2761.7071.1385690,002.4604.9207.380Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 6.053 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.537 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.706,7 tok/s Generation, 5.892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.614 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 896,6 tok/s Generation, 3.860 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.490 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 262,5 tok/s Generation, 700 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.130 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.651,0 tok/s Generation, 4.247 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.765 ms (25 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.791,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.706,7 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.651,0 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 896,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 262,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.9711.8811.7911.7021.6123.9554.1244.2924.460Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 4.208 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 22.066 ms (37 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.791,5 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

1.9711.8811.7911.7021.6123.9554.1244.2924.460Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.791,5 tok/s Generation, 4.208 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 22.066 ms (37 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.791,5 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 65 W
⚡ TDP 71 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)71 W missingCPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.021
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.029
Token / kWh10.19M
Acquisition (system)EUR 8,394 full priceGPU EUR 3,000 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,767
Output tokens (2 years)12.67B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (65 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA RTX A6000Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.