Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512

Performance benchmark · measured on 21.08.2026 16:21

Benchmark-IDrun-20260821-162702-cd2d93
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation23,29tok/s
Prefill272,52tok/s
Time to First Token55.104,00ms
Total duration553,03s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
9of 11 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 20 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 23,3 tok/s
-53 % vs Ø 49,5
Prefill 272,5 tok/s
-40 % vs Ø 451,4
Time to First Token 55.104 ms
+50 % vs Ø 36.624
Distribution in the field22 – 111 tok/s
Ø 50 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260821-162702-cd2d93
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260821-162702-cd2d93 # GPU : NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 60 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 24000 \ -np 5
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.24000
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.24000
np5

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

9417064712350,003.3986.79610.193Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 8.070 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.939 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 620,3 tok/s Generation, 6.308 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.898 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 569,7 tok/s Generation, 8.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.901 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 331,6 tok/s Generation, 4.022 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.336 ms (5 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 206,3 tok/s Generation, 2.714 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.109 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 152,1 tok/s Generation, 1.715 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.815 ms (13 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 108,5 tok/s Generation, 1.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.385 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 8,9 tok/s Generation, 22 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 906 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB - 23,3 tok/s Generation, 235 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 34.419 ms (2 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCI...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 725,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 620,3 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 569,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 331,6 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 206,3 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 152,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 108,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 23,3 tok/s this runAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 8,9 tok/s

CPUby processor

9417064712350,003.3986.79610.193Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 8.070 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.939 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 620,3 tok/s Generation, 6.308 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.898 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 569,7 tok/s Generation, 8.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.901 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 331,6 tok/s Generation, 3.668 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.010 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 247,7 tok/s Generation, 4.553 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.826 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 206,3 tok/s Generation, 2.714 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.109 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 152,1 tok/s Generation, 1.697 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.360 ms (16 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 8,9 tok/s Generation, 22 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 906 ms (2 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 23,3 tok/s Generation, 235 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 34.419 ms (2 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 725,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 620,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 569,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 331,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 247,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 206,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 152,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 23,3 tok/s this runAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 8,9 tok/s

MBby mainboard

9417064712350,003.3346.66810.003Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 8.070 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.939 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 620,3 tok/s Generation, 6.308 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.898 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 569,7 tok/s Generation, 4.780 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.156 ms (24 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 331,6 tok/s Generation, 3.668 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.010 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 247,7 tok/s Generation, 4.553 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.826 ms (2 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 152,1 tok/s Generation, 1.697 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.360 ms (16 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd SHWSA (MS-S1 MAX) - 8,9 tok/s Generation, 22 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 906 ms (1 Lauf)Meigao Innovation Tec...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 8,9 tok/s Generation, 22 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 906 ms (1 Lauf)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) - 23,3 tok/s Generation, 235 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 34.419 ms (2 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Shenzhen Meigao Elect...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 725,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 620,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 569,7 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 331,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 247,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 152,1 tok/s★ Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 23,3 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd SHWSA (MS-S1 MAX) 8,9 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 8,9 tok/s

ENGby engine

89469048728379,67223.6006.4779.354Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 7.865 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.602 ms (3 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 247,7 tok/s Generation, 2.212 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.889 ms (6 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 645,1 tok/s Generation, 3.938 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.776 ms (49 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
vLLM 725,6 tok/s★ llama.cpp 645,1 tok/s this rununbekannt 247,7 tok/s

DRVby driver

9417064712350,001.7263.4525.178Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 4.179 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.860 ms (54 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 29,4 tok/s Generation, 1.380 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.259 ms (3 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-genericROCm 7.2.0 - 8,9 tok/s Generation, 22 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 906 ms (1 Lauf)ROCm 7.2.0
unbekannt 725,6 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 29,4 tok/sROCm 7.2.0 8,9 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 0 W
⚡ TDP 250 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)250 W estimated (TDP)GPU 250 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.075
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.89
Token / kWh335.38K
Acquisition (system)EUR 120 missingPSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 1,434
Output tokens (2 years)1.47B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (0 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GBDevstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionDevstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionDevstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.