Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512

Performance benchmark · measured on 21.08.2026 14:22

Benchmark-IDrun-20260821-144810-8ca180
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense14BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation23,11tok/s
Prefill639,38tok/s
Time to First Token44.372,50ms
Total duration977,48s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
694of 820 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 15 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 23,1 tok/s
-95 % vs Ø 485,2
Prefill 639,4 tok/s
-86 % vs Ø 4.661,8
Time to First Token 44.373 ms
-31 % vs Ø 63.970
Distribution in the field0 – 2.491 tok/s
Ø 485 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e28775
2.491,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-b37ed9
2.414,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-4cca42
2.182,7 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-d87c73
2.143,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-9c966e
1.995,4 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-8007c4
1.993,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-0aed86
1.937,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-8db0fa
1.911,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-e0eafd
1.897,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-7c961d
1.890,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-2ed9dd
1.878,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-26063b
1.835,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-a77046
1.830,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-c6e7e0
1.819,5 tok/s
Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512 this runNVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB · run-20260821-144810-8ca180
23,1 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260821-144810-8ca180
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260821-144810-8ca180 # GPU : NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 60 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 48000 \ -np 10
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.48000
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.48000
np10

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.3701.0276853420,004.2228.44512.667Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.060,0 tok/s Generation, 10.288 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.218 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.028,1 tok/s Generation, 7.724 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.732 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 911,6 tok/s Generation, 8.521 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.238 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 590,0 tok/s Generation, 5.214 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.398 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 543,1 tok/s Generation, 4.926 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.681 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 329,9 tok/s Generation, 3.853 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.485 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 226,7 tok/s Generation, 2.572 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.319 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 66,3 tok/s Generation, 1.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.659 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 60,4 tok/s Generation, 1.290 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.121 ms (2 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB - 41,5 tok/s Generation, 501 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.353 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCI...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.060,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.028,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 911,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 590,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 543,1 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 329,9 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 226,7 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 66,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 60,4 tok/s★ NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GB 41,5 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

1.3701.0276853420,004.2228.44512.667Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.060,0 tok/s Generation, 10.288 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.218 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.028,1 tok/s Generation, 7.724 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.732 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 911,6 tok/s Generation, 8.521 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.238 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 590,0 tok/s Generation, 3.452 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.346 ms (18 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 543,1 tok/s Generation, 4.926 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.681 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 329,9 tok/s Generation, 3.853 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.485 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 66,3 tok/s Generation, 1.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.659 ms (2 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz - 60,4 tok/s Generation, 1.290 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.121 ms (2 Laufe)Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 41,5 tok/s Generation, 501 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.353 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.060,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.028,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 911,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 590,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 543,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 329,9 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 66,3 tok/sIntel(R) Core(TM) i5-7400 CPU @ 3.00GHz 60,4 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 41,5 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

1.3701.0276853420,004.2228.44512.667Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.060,0 tok/s Generation, 10.288 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.218 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.028,1 tok/s Generation, 7.724 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.732 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 911,6 tok/s Generation, 5.604 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.268 ms (24 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 590,0 tok/s Generation, 3.452 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.346 ms (18 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 543,1 tok/s Generation, 4.926 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.681 ms (6 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 66,3 tok/s Generation, 1.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.659 ms (2 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...ASRock H110 Pro BTC+ - 60,4 tok/s Generation, 1.290 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.121 ms (2 Laufe)ASRock H110 Pro BTC+Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) - 41,5 tok/s Generation, 501 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.353 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Shenzhen Meigao Elect...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.060,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.028,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 911,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 590,0 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 543,1 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 66,3 tok/sASRock H110 Pro BTC+ 60,4 tok/s★ Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd F1FXM (DeskMini Series) 41,5 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

1.3681.0266843420,01.5724.4407.30810.176Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 1.015,7 tok/s Generation, 8.655 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.956 ms (9 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 51,0 tok/s Generation, 3.092 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 775 ms (3 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.060,0 tok/s Generation, 4.754 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.029 ms (55 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.060,0 tok/s this runvLLM 1.015,7 tok/sunbekannt 51,0 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.3681.0266843420,02.3763.5914.8056.019Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.060,0 tok/s Generation, 5.303 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.175 ms (64 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 51,0 tok/s Generation, 3.092 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 775 ms (3 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 1.060,0 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 51,0 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 0 W
⚡ TDP 250 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)250 W estimated (TDP)GPU 250 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.075
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.90
Token / kWh332.78K
Acquisition (system)EUR 120 missingPSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 1,434
Output tokens (2 years)1.46B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (0 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16GBMinistral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionMinistral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Ministral-3-14B-Reasoning-2512NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.