Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Performance benchmark · measured on 18.08.2026 16:17

Benchmark-IDrun-20260818-162301-eaa544
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE35BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q8_0
Generation201,53tok/s
Prefill2.489,31tok/s
Time to First Token8.976,00ms
Total duration120,51s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
26of 80 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 68 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 201,5 tok/s
+33 % vs Ø 151,4
Prefill 2.489,3 tok/s
+0 % vs Ø 2.479,5
Time to First Token 8.976 ms
-72 % vs Ø 32.211
Distribution in the field8 – 344 tok/s
Ø 151 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 2x AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 247 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q8_0
Model: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260818-162301-eaa544
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3.5-35B-A3B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260818-162301-eaa544 # GPU : 2x AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build_hip/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/bench_scratch/Qwen_Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Q8_0.gguf \ --alias Qwen3.5-35B-A3B \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -sm layer \ --tensor-split 1,1 \ -c 49152 \ -np 12 \ --jinja \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.49152
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/bench_scratch/Qwen_Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-Q8_0.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Split-Mode?Verteilung ueber mehrere GPUs: none (nur eine GPU), layer (Layer aufteilen) oder row (Tensoren zeilenweise).layer
Tensor-Split?Verhaeltnis, in dem die Modell-Layer auf mehrere GPUs verteilt werden, z.B. 3,1.1,1
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.49152
np12

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.9671.4759844920,005.26410.52815.792Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.520,4 tok/s Generation, 12.809 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.176 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.416,7 tok/s Generation, 5.541 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.907 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.398,4 tok/s Generation, 6.870 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.115 ms (11 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 866,1 tok/s Generation, 3.371 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.651 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 220,5 tok/s Generation, 2.194 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.070 ms (27 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 142,2 tok/s Generation, 508 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.910 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 46,9 tok/s Generation, 3.713 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 537 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 212,5 tok/s Generation, 2.015 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.888 ms (12 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.520,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.416,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.398,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 866,1 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 220,5 tok/s★ AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 212,5 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 142,2 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 46,9 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.9671.4759844920,005.20410.40715.611Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.520,4 tok/s Generation, 12.809 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.176 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.416,7 tok/s Generation, 5.541 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.907 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.398,4 tok/s Generation, 6.870 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.115 ms (11 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 866,1 tok/s Generation, 3.371 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.651 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 220,5 tok/s Generation, 2.194 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.070 ms (27 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...NVIDIA Grace - 46,9 tok/s Generation, 3.713 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 537 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA GraceAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 212,5 tok/s Generation, 1.513 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.562 ms (18 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.520,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.416,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.398,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 866,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 220,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 212,5 tok/s this runNVIDIA Grace 46,9 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.9671.4759844920,005.20410.40715.611Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.520,4 tok/s Generation, 12.809 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.176 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.416,7 tok/s Generation, 5.541 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.907 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.398,4 tok/s Generation, 3.547 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.004 ms (38 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 866,1 tok/s Generation, 3.371 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.651 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 46,9 tok/s Generation, 3.713 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 537 ms (1 Lauf)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 212,5 tok/s Generation, 1.513 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.562 ms (18 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.520,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.416,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.398,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 866,1 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 212,5 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 46,9 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.9611.4719804900,01.4313.7196.0078.296Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 1.028,6 tok/s Generation, 7.075 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.086 ms (11 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 78,5 tok/s Generation, 2.652 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 858 ms (5 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.520,4 tok/s Generation, 3.363 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 18.081 ms (53 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.520,4 tok/s this runvLLM 1.028,6 tok/sunbekannt 78,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.9671.4759844920,02.1682.9423.7164.490Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.520,4 tok/s Generation, 4.006 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.265 ms (63 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 78,5 tok/s Generation, 2.652 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 858 ms (5 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-genericNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 46,9 tok/s Generation, 3.713 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 537 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...
unbekannt 1.520,4 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 78,5 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 46,9 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 600 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)600 W estimated (TDP)GPU 590 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.18
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.25
Token / kWh1.21M
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,156 missingRAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 5,310
Output tokens (2 years)12.71B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B2x AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual SlotQwen3.5-35B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3.5-35B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3.5-35B-A3B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.