Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8-27B

Performance benchmark · measured on 18.08.2026 00:16

Benchmark-IDrun-20260818-003841-e50237
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Qwen3_5ForConditionalGeneration (multimodal, image-text-to-text)27BRuntime: vLLMQuantisierung: AWQ-INT4
Configuration note: Es sind 4 Grafikkarten installiert, aber nur 3 wurden fuer diesen Lauf genutzt. Mit allen 4 GPUs koennte der Durchsatz deutlich hoeher liegen.
Generation32,86tok/s
Prefill1.186,99tok/s
Time to First Token10.509,50ms
Total duration333,48s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
655of 841 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 22 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 32,9 tok/s
-88 % vs Ø 274,3
Prefill 1.187,0 tok/s
-69 % vs Ø 3.891,1
Time to First Token 10.510 ms
-75 % vs Ø 41.842
Distribution in the field0 – 1.349 tok/s
Ø 274 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-0adf6d
1.349,3 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-5b4937
1.301,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-30d864
1.188,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-5432cd
1.164,8 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-9e81f9
1.136,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-09627f
1.135,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-058a31
1.113,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-305ad6
1.007,8 tok/s
Qwen3.8-27B this run4× AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · run-20260818-003841-e50237
32,9 tok/s

Hardware

GPU: 4x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · 32 GB VRAM · only 3 of 4 used
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: AWQ-INT4
Model: Qwen3.8-27B

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260818-003841-e50237
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3.8-27B # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260818-003841-e50237 # GPU : 4x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ vllm serve \ --model Qwen3.8-27B
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3.8-27B

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Videoreihe und Benchmarkauswertung zur AMD R9700
Model comparison

Qwen3.8-27B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2522412292182062.0702.1582.2462.335Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 229,4 tok/s Generation, 2.202 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.623 ms (36 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...
★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 229,4 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

2522412292182062.0702.1582.2462.335Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 229,4 tok/s Generation, 2.202 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.623 ms (36 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 229,4 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

2522412292182062.0702.1582.2462.335Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 229,4 tok/s Generation, 2.202 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.623 ms (36 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 229,4 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

27722216811459,51.3732.0662.7593.453Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 107,0 tok/s Generation, 1.782 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.546 ms (24 Laufe)llama.cppvLLM - 229,4 tok/s Generation, 3.043 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.777 ms (12 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
★ vLLM 229,4 tok/s this runllama.cpp 107,0 tok/s

DRVby driver

2522412292182062.0702.1582.2462.335Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 229,4 tok/s Generation, 2.202 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.623 ms (36 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 229,4 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 85 W
⚡ TDP 371 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)371 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.94
Token / kWh318.86K
Acquisition (system)EUR 6,824 full priceGPU EUR 1,400 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,774
Output tokens (2 years)2.07B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (85 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3.8-27BAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Qwen3.8-27B4x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Qwen3.8-27BAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Qwen3.8-27BAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.