Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5

Performance benchmark · measured on 17.08.2026 15:25

Benchmark-IDrun-20260817-153343-c38135
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense49BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation71,02tok/s
Prefill596,72tok/s
Time to First Token43.608,00ms
Total duration389,77s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
72of 80 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 10 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 71,0 tok/s
-53 % vs Ø 151,4
Prefill 596,7 tok/s
-76 % vs Ø 2.479,5
Time to First Token 43.608 ms
+35 % vs Ø 32.211
Distribution in the field8 – 344 tok/s
Ø 151 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot · 48 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores
RAM: 247 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260817-153343-c38135
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260817-153343-c38135 # GPU : AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build_hip/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--gabriellarson--Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-GGUF/snapshots/c324e134daf0a0d4f9e3e136ae525df9fdebea3b/Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5 \ -ngl 999 \ -fa on \ -c 49152 \ -np 12 \ --jinja \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.49152
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--gabriellarson--Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-GGUF/snapshots/c324e134daf0a0d4f9e3e136ae525df9fdebea3b/Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
faon
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.49152
np12

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

4713532351180,001.0242.0473.071Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 2.480 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.861 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 303,0 tok/s Generation, 2.253 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.522 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 25,2 tok/s Generation, 243 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 129.179 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 20,2 tok/s Generation, 333 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 137.310 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 19,6 tok/s Generation, 407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 91.059 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 11,6 tok/s Generation, 23 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 293.489 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 71,0 tok/s Generation, 517 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.661 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 364,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 303,0 tok/s★ AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 71,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 25,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 20,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 19,6 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 11,6 tok/s

CPUby processor

4713532351180,001.0242.0473.071Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 2.480 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.861 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 303,0 tok/s Generation, 2.253 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.522 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 20,2 tok/s Generation, 333 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 137.310 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 19,6 tok/s Generation, 407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 91.059 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 11,6 tok/s Generation, 23 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 293.489 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 71,0 tok/s Generation, 380 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 76.920 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 364,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 303,0 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 71,0 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 20,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 19,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 11,6 tok/s

MBby mainboard

4693522351170,001.0052.0103.015Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 2.480 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.861 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 303,0 tok/s Generation, 1.138 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 155.505 ms (18 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 20,2 tok/s Generation, 333 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 137.310 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 19,6 tok/s Generation, 407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 91.059 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 71,0 tok/s Generation, 380 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 76.920 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 364,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 303,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 71,0 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 20,2 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 19,6 tok/s

ENGby engine

4003823643463289249631.0021.041Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 982 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 120.827 ms (33 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 364,1 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

4003823643463289249631.0021.041Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 982 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 120.827 ms (33 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 364,1 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 10 W
⚡ TDP 305 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)305 W estimated (TDP)GPU 295 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.092
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.36
Token / kWh838.27K
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,126 missingRAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 3,729
Output tokens (2 years)4.48B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual SlotLlama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLlama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.53x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionLlama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.53x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.