Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K

Performance benchmark · measured on 17.08.2026 10:30

Benchmark-IDrun-20260817-120945-12245b
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense47BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation25,42tok/s
Prefill177,78tok/s
Time to First Token109.132,00ms
Total duration273,07s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
687of 820 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 16 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 25,4 tok/s
-95 % vs Ø 485,2
Prefill 177,8 tok/s
-96 % vs Ø 4.661,8
Time to First Token 109.132 ms
+71 % vs Ø 63.970
Distribution in the field0 – 2.491 tok/s
Ø 485 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e28775
2.491,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-b37ed9
2.414,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-4cca42
2.182,7 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-d87c73
2.143,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-9c966e
1.995,4 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-8007c4
1.993,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-0aed86
1.937,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-8db0fa
1.911,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-e0eafd
1.897,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-7c961d
1.890,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-2ed9dd
1.878,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-26063b
1.835,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-a77046
1.830,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-c6e7e0
1.819,5 tok/s
Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K this run4× AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · run-20260817-120945-12245b
25,4 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 4x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260817-120945-12245b
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260817-120945-12245b # GPU : 4x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ llama-server \ --model nvidia_Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.nvidia_Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

26219713165,60,003787561.134Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 203,5 tok/s Generation, 892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.009 ms (10 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 197,2 tok/s Generation, 547 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 32.881 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 174,9 tok/s Generation, 938 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 18.279 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 20,4 tok/s Generation, 168 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 134.329 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 16,9 tok/s Generation, 215 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 138.108 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 10,7 tok/s Generation, 159 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 36.786 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 28,1 tok/s Generation, 174 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 129.957 ms (20 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 203,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 197,2 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 174,9 tok/s★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 28,1 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 20,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 16,9 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 10,7 tok/s

CPUby processor

26219713165,60,003787561.134Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 203,5 tok/s Generation, 892 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 25.009 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 197,2 tok/s Generation, 547 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 32.881 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 174,9 tok/s Generation, 938 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 18.279 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 20,4 tok/s Generation, 168 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 134.329 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 16,9 tok/s Generation, 215 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 138.108 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 10,7 tok/s Generation, 159 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 36.786 ms (2 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 28,1 tok/s Generation, 174 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 129.957 ms (20 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 203,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 197,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 174,9 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 28,1 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 20,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 16,9 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 10,7 tok/s

MBby mainboard

26219713165,60,003787561.134Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 197,2 tok/s Generation, 547 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 32.881 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 174,9 tok/s Generation, 938 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 18.279 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 20,4 tok/s Generation, 168 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 134.329 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 16,9 tok/s Generation, 215 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 138.108 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 10,7 tok/s Generation, 159 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 36.786 ms (2 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 203,5 tok/s Generation, 413 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 94.974 ms (30 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 203,5 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 197,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 174,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 20,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 16,9 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 10,7 tok/s

ENGby engine

224214203193183391408425441Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 203,5 tok/s Generation, 416 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 88.490 ms (44 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 203,5 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

224214203193183391408425441Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 203,5 tok/s Generation, 416 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 88.490 ms (44 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 203,5 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 145 W
⚡ TDP 1271 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)1,271 W estimated (TDP)GPU 1,200 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.38
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 4.17
Token / kWh72.00K
Acquisition (system)EUR 11,114 full priceGPU EUR 5,600 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 240
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 17,794
Output tokens (2 years)1.60B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (145 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K4x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Nemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionNemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128K3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionNemotron-H-47B-Reasoning-128KNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.