# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3.6-35B-A3B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260817-120413-f91742 # GPU : AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores # RAM : 247 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ llama-server \ --model Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.	llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.	Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Model comparison

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.489,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.409,4 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.367,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 852,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 800,4 tok/sAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 450,5 tok/s★ AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 296,2 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 271,4 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 235,5 tok/sNVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32GB 225,9 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 167,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 142,9 tok/sIntel Arc Pro B70 124,5 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 98,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 27,5 tok/sCPU-only 4,3 tok/s

CPUby processor

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.489,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.409,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.367,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 852,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 830,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 800,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX 16-Cores 450,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 296,2 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics 225,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen 3 3100 4-Core Processor 198,8 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 181,7 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 167,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 124,5 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 98,3 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 4,3 tok/s

MBby mainboard

ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.489,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.409,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.367,3 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 852,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 830,5 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 450,5 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING 225,9 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 181,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 167,1 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 124,5 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd SHWSA (MS-S1 MAX) 98,3 tok/s

ENGby engine

★ llama.cpp 1.489,1 tok/s this runvLLM 952,8 tok/sunbekannt 830,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

unbekannt 1.489,1 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 167,1 tok/sIntel 26.18.38308.4 124,5 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 79,4 tok/s

💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URL Reset

⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh

⚙️ System utilization 100 %

🖥️ Acquisition EUR

🔌 Idle 10 W

⚡ TDP 305 W

☁️ External LLM (API) show

Input €/1M Output €/1M Input per output token

Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh

Avg power (incl. idle)305 W estimated (TDP)GPU 295 + Board 10 W full load

Avg cost / hourEUR 0.092

Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.14

Token / kWh2.17M

Acquisition (system)EUR 7,917 partial priceGPU EUR 3,911 · CPU EUR 1,880 · RAM EUR 1,976 · PSU EUR 150

Electricity (2 years)–

TCO (2 years)EUR 9,520

Output tokens (2 years)11.61B

☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison

External LLM cost (2 years)–

Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (10 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

	Qwen3.6-35B-A3BAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot	Qwen3.6-35B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition	Qwen3.6-35B-A3B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition	Qwen3.6-35B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
Electricity cost (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Acquisition cost	–	–	–	–
Total cost (TCO)	–	–	–	–
Generated tokens (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Token price via API	–	–	–	–
Break-even point (days)	–	–	–	–
Result (savings / extra cost)	–	–	–	–

AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot · this run 184 tok/s NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 813 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 745 tok/s NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 745 tok/s

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.