Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507

Performance benchmark · measured on 10.08.2026 10:26

Benchmark-IDrun-20260810-083755-856a6c
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cpp batched-bench SYCLQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
For context: Diese Plattform nutzt Unified Memory – die "VRAM" ist gemeinsamer System-RAM (APU/Superchip); das Modell teilt sich den Speicher mit dem System.
Generation143,56tok/s
Prefill1.267,48tok/s
Time to First Token4.040,00ms
Total duration0,00s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
5of 9 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 50 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 143,6 tok/s
-45 % vs Ø 261,4
Prefill 1.267,5 tok/s
+12 % vs Ø 1.128,4
Time to First Token 4.040 ms
-94 % vs Ø 64.447
Distribution in the field27 – 826 tok/s
Ø 261 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: Intel Arc Pro B70 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics
RAM: 61 GB
Mainboard: Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series)

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp batched-bench SYCL
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Driver: Intel 26.18.38308.4
Model: Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507

Anmerkung

llama-batched-bench, 1x Intel Arc Pro B70, npl=10 (pp512/tg128), ngl=99

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260810-083755-856a6c
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260810-083755-856a6c # GPU : Intel Arc Pro B70 # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 61 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ llama-batched-bench (llama.cpp SYCL) \ --model /root/models/Qwen_Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf \ -ngl 99 \ -c 8192 \ -npl 10
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llama-batched-bench (llama.cpp SYCL)
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.8192
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/models/Qwen_Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.99
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.8192
npl10

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1711.6281.0855430,006.26012.52018.780Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.671,0 tok/s Generation, 15.160 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.212 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.658,1 tok/s Generation, 15.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.030 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.515,7 tok/s Generation, 13.445 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.300 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 905,1 tok/s Generation, 8.498 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.639 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 264,2 tok/s Generation, 4.310 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.293 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 169,9 tok/s Generation, 5.183 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.923 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 152,7 tok/s Generation, 1.209 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 22.640 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 107,6 tok/s Generation, 2.228 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.963 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 97,6 tok/s Generation, 2.543 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 36.082 ms (26 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...CPU-only - 7,1 tok/s Generation, 102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 109.338 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyIntel Arc Pro B70 - 143,6 tok/s Generation, 1.123 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.220 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Intel Arc Pro B70
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.671,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.658,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.515,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 905,1 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 264,2 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 169,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 152,7 tok/s★ Intel Arc Pro B70 143,6 tok/s this runAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 107,6 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 97,6 tok/sCPU-only 7,1 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.1711.6281.0855430,006.26012.52018.780Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.671,0 tok/s Generation, 15.160 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.212 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.658,1 tok/s Generation, 15.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.030 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.515,7 tok/s Generation, 13.445 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.300 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 905,1 tok/s Generation, 8.498 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.639 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 264,2 tok/s Generation, 3.069 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.032 ms (15 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...NVIDIA Grace - 169,9 tok/s Generation, 5.183 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.923 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GraceAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 107,6 tok/s Generation, 2.228 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.963 ms (2 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 97,6 tok/s Generation, 2.543 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 36.082 ms (26 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 7,1 tok/s Generation, 102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 109.338 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 143,6 tok/s Generation, 1.123 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.220 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.671,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.658,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.515,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 905,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 264,2 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 169,9 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 143,6 tok/s this runAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 107,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 97,6 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 7,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.1711.6281.0855430,006.26012.52018.780Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.671,0 tok/s Generation, 15.160 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.212 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.658,1 tok/s Generation, 15.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.030 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.515,7 tok/s Generation, 5.347 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.652 ms (35 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 905,1 tok/s Generation, 8.498 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.639 ms (6 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 264,2 tok/s Generation, 3.069 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.032 ms (15 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 169,9 tok/s Generation, 5.183 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.923 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 107,6 tok/s Generation, 2.228 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.963 ms (2 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 7,1 tok/s Generation, 102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 109.338 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) - 143,6 tok/s Generation, 1.123 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.220 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Shenzhen Meigao Elect...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.671,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.658,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.515,7 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 905,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 264,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 169,9 tok/s★ Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 143,6 tok/s this runBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 107,6 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 7,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.1531.6151.0765380,01.8015.2038.60612.008Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 961,5 tok/s Generation, 10.207 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.750 ms (17 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 97,6 tok/s Generation, 3.602 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.021 ms (9 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.671,0 tok/s Generation, 5.348 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.944 ms (53 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.671,0 tok/s this runvLLM 961,5 tok/sunbekannt 97,6 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.1531.6151.0765380,002.7625.5248.285Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.671,0 tok/s Generation, 6.845 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.896 ms (64 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 169,9 tok/s Generation, 5.183 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.923 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...AMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 97,6 tok/s Generation, 3.602 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.021 ms (9 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-genericIntel 26.18.38308.4 - 143,6 tok/s Generation, 1.123 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.220 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Intel 26.18.38308.4
unbekannt 1.671,0 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 169,9 tok/s★ Intel 26.18.38308.4 143,6 tok/s this runAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 97,6 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 0 W
⚡ TDP 230 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)230 W estimated (TDP)GPU 230 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.069
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.13
Token / kWh2.25M
Acquisition (system)EUR 120 missingPSU EUR 120
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 1,329
Output tokens (2 years)9.05B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (0 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507Intel Arc Pro B70Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-25073x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.