Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaPoolside

Laguna-S-2.1-INT4

Performance benchmark · measured on 09.08.2026 11:50

Benchmark-IDrun-20260809-131004-c7ba7c
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Runtime: llama.cppQuantisierung: INT4
Generation25,50tok/s
Prefill156,67tok/s
Time to First Token125.738,50ms
Total duration885,63s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
62of 76 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 19 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 25,5 tok/s
-91 % vs Ø 285,7
Prefill 156,7 tok/s
-96 % vs Ø 3.902,7
Time to First Token 125.739 ms
+268 % vs Ø 34.131
Distribution in the field0 – 827 tok/s
Ø 286 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260809-131004-c7ba7c
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Laguna-S-2.1-INT4 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260809-131004-c7ba7c # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 92 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF/snapshots/750f92f90cf54159c4d7a610cb7b3e74498e75c6/UD-Q4_K_M/Laguna-S-2.1-UD-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00003.gguf \ --alias Laguna-S-2.1-INT4 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 12 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Laguna-S-2.1-INT4
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Laguna-S-2.1-GGUF/snapshots/750f92f90cf54159c4d7a610cb7b3e74498e75c6/UD-Q4_K_M/Laguna-S-2.1-UD-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00003.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.12
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Laguna-S-2.1-INT4 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.0838125422710,001.3292.6583.988Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 3.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.299 ms (10 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 779,8 tok/s Generation, 3.230 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.207 ms (24 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 70,5 tok/s Generation, 2.223 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122.760 ms (13 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 42,3 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.435 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 13,3 tok/s Generation, 95 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 143.534 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 32,8 tok/s Generation, 163 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.427 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 835,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 779,8 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 70,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 42,3 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 32,8 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 13,3 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.0838125422710,001.3292.6583.988Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 3.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.299 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 779,8 tok/s Generation, 3.230 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.207 ms (24 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 70,5 tok/s Generation, 2.223 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 122.760 ms (13 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 42,3 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.435 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 13,3 tok/s Generation, 95 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 143.534 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 32,8 tok/s Generation, 163 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.427 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 835,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 779,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 70,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 42,3 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 32,8 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 13,3 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.0838125422710,001.3272.6533.980Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 3.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.299 ms (10 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 779,8 tok/s Generation, 2.876 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 49.104 ms (37 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 42,3 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.435 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 13,3 tok/s Generation, 95 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 143.534 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 32,8 tok/s Generation, 163 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.427 ms (6 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Meigao Innovation Tec...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 835,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 779,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 42,3 tok/s★ Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 32,8 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 13,3 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.0838125412710,03363.6697.00110.333Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 70,5 tok/s Generation, 6.497 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.930 ms (3 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 13,4 tok/s Generation, 8.629 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 305 ms (1 Lauf)unbekanntllama.cpp - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 2.040 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 64.113 ms (55 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 835,1 tok/s this runvLLM 70,5 tok/sunbekannt 13,4 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.0838125412710,06083.8367.06410.292Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 835,1 tok/s Generation, 2.271 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 61.000 ms (58 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 13,4 tok/s Generation, 8.629 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 305 ms (1 Lauf)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 835,1 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 13,4 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 50 W
⚡ TDP 477 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)477 W estimated (TDP)GPU 450 + CPU 17 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.14
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 1.56
Token / kWh192.35K
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,986 partial priceGPU EUR 999 · CPU EUR 549 · RAM EUR 1,288 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 5,494
Output tokens (2 years)1.61B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (50 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Laguna-S-2.1-INT4NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 TiLaguna-S-2.1-INT4NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLaguna-S-2.1-INT4NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLaguna-S-2.1-INT4NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.