Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1

Performance benchmark · measured on 07.08.2026 07:29

Benchmark-IDrun-20260807-204725-e38489
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense253BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation0,63tok/s
Prefill3,95tok/s
Time to First Token477.862,00ms
Total duration1.200,00s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
447of 455 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 1 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 0,6 tok/s
-98 % vs Ø 35,3
Prefill 4,0 tok/s
-100 % vs Ø 1.966,4
Time to First Token 477.862 ms
+1.233 % vs Ø 35.848
Distribution in the field1 – 148 tok/s
Ø 35 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260807-204725-e38489
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260807-204725-e38489 # GPU : 3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1-GGUF/snapshots/fa034db97ae9c144e5d5a8fd8fc4fefdd363b8db/nvidia.Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1.Q4_K_M-00001-of-00012.gguf \ --alias Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1-GGUF/snapshots/fa034db97ae9c144e5d5a8fd8fc4fefdd363b8db/nvidia.Llama-3_1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1.Q4_K_M-00001-of-00012.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Videoreihe und Benchmarkauswertung zur AMD R9700
Model comparison

Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v1 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

80,760,540,320,20,00326651977Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 62,1 tok/s Generation, 789 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 72.840 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 1,7 tok/s Generation, 45 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 141.946 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 30 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 185.560 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 0,1 tok/s Generation, 7 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 290.783 ms (19 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 2,7 tok/s Generation, 17 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 423.031 ms (17 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 62,1 tok/s★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 2,7 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 0,1 tok/s

CPUby processor

80,760,540,320,20,00326651977Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 62,1 tok/s Generation, 789 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 72.840 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 1,7 tok/s Generation, 45 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 141.946 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 30 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 185.560 ms (8 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 0,1 tok/s Generation, 7 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 290.783 ms (19 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 2,7 tok/s Generation, 17 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 423.031 ms (17 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 62,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 2,7 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 0,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

80,760,540,320,20,0090180269Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 1,7 tok/s Generation, 45 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 141.946 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 30 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 185.560 ms (8 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 0,1 tok/s Generation, 7 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 290.783 ms (19 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 62,1 tok/s Generation, 218 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 331.677 ms (23 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 62,1 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 0,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

68,365,262,159,055,998102107111Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 62,1 tok/s Generation, 104 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 284.222 ms (53 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 62,1 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

68,365,262,159,055,998102107111Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 62,1 tok/s Generation, 104 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 284.222 ms (53 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 62,1 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 125 W
⚡ TDP 971 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)971 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 128.44
Token / kWh2.34K
Acquisition (system)EUR 9,674 full priceGPU EUR 4,200 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 14,778
Output tokens (2 years)39.74M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (125 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v13x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Llama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v13x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionLlama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v13x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionLlama-3.1-Nemotron-Ultra-253B-v13x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.