Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMiniMax

MiniMax-M2.7

Performance benchmark · measured on 05.08.2026 23:03

Benchmark-IDrun-20260806-094439-507389
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE230BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: UD-Q4_K_M
Generation5,85tok/s
Prefill70,95tok/s
Time to First Token147.488,50ms
Total duration1.200,00s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
55of 69 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 21 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 5,9 tok/s
-99 % vs Ø 435,4
Prefill 71,0 tok/s
-99 % vs Ø 5.029,4
Time to First Token 147.489 ms
+163 % vs Ø 56.042
Distribution in the field0 – 1.302 tok/s
Ø 435 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor
RAM: 126 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: UD-Q4_K_M
Model: MiniMax-M2.7

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260806-094439-507389
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : MiniMax-M2.7 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260806-094439-507389 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 # CPU : AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor # RAM : 126 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--MiniMax-M2.7-GGUF/snapshots/d2a05ccf69491b03db0cc40b335aec14bdaf7198/UD-Q4_K_M/MiniMax-M2.7-UD-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00004.gguf \ --alias MiniMax-M2.7 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 12 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.MiniMax-M2.7
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--MiniMax-M2.7-GGUF/snapshots/d2a05ccf69491b03db0cc40b335aec14bdaf7198/UD-Q4_K_M/MiniMax-M2.7-UD-Q4_K_M-00001-of-00004.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.12
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.7 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

7135353561780,001.7803.5615.341Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 548,6 tok/s Generation, 3.645 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.650 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 174,2 tok/s Generation, 4.309 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.582 ms (13 Laufe)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 14,5 tok/s Generation, 187 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 92.001 ms (14 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 7,0 tok/s Generation, 84 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 98.659 ms (5 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 4,0 tok/s Generation, 10 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 346.143 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...CPU-only - 2,6 tok/s Generation, 24 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 193.311 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 6,0 tok/s Generation, 66 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 126.812 ms (5 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 548,6 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 174,2 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 14,5 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 7,0 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 6,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 4,0 tok/sCPU-only 2,6 tok/s

CPUby processor

7135353561780,001.7803.5615.341Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 548,6 tok/s Generation, 3.645 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.650 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...NVIDIA Grace - 174,2 tok/s Generation, 4.309 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.582 ms (13 Laufe)NVIDIA GraceAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 14,5 tok/s Generation, 187 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 92.001 ms (14 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 7,0 tok/s Generation, 84 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 98.659 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 4,0 tok/s Generation, 10 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 346.143 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 2,6 tok/s Generation, 24 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 193.311 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 6,0 tok/s Generation, 66 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 126.812 ms (5 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 548,6 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 174,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 14,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 7,0 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 6,0 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 4,0 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 2,6 tok/s

MBby mainboard

7135353561780,001.7803.5615.341Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 548,6 tok/s Generation, 1.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 67.296 ms (20 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 174,2 tok/s Generation, 4.309 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.582 ms (13 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 7,0 tok/s Generation, 84 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 98.659 ms (5 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 4,0 tok/s Generation, 10 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 346.143 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 2,6 tok/s Generation, 24 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 193.311 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 6,0 tok/s Generation, 66 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 126.812 ms (5 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 548,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 174,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 7,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 6,0 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 4,0 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 2,6 tok/s

ENGby engine

7135343561780,001.4802.9594.439Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 174,2 tok/s Generation, 3.600 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.381 ms (16 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 3,0 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.493 ms (1 Lauf)unbekanntllama.cpp - 548,6 tok/s Generation, 738 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 125.269 ms (32 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 548,6 tok/s this runvLLM 174,2 tok/sunbekannt 3,0 tok/s

DRVby driver

7135343561780,001.7733.5455.318Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 548,6 tok/s Generation, 720 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 116.461 ms (35 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 174,2 tok/s Generation, 4.309 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.582 ms (13 Laufe)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...AMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 3,0 tok/s Generation, 139 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.493 ms (1 Lauf)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 548,6 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 174,2 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 3,0 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 72 W
⚡ TDP 622 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)622 W estimated (TDP)GPU 575 + CPU 35 + Board 12 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.19
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 8.85
Token / kWh33.89K
Acquisition (system)EUR 4,986 full priceGPU EUR 3,300 · CPU EUR 349 · Board EUR 149 · RAM EUR 1,008 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,253
Output tokens (2 years)368.97M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (72 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

MiniMax-M2.7NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090MiniMax-M2.73x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionMiniMax-M2.73x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionMiniMax-M2.7NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark)
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.