Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5

Performance benchmark · measured on 04.08.2026 16:54

Benchmark-IDrun-20260805-053412-2fc7c1
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense49BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation3,05tok/s
Prefill24,77tok/s
Time to First Token98.875,50ms
Total duration869,40s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
116of 125 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 7 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 3,1 tok/s
-91 % vs Ø 33,0
Prefill 24,8 tok/s
-99 % vs Ø 1.692,2
Time to First Token 98.876 ms
+338 % vs Ø 22.553
Distribution in the field1 – 140 tok/s
Ø 33 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260805-053412-2fc7c1
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260805-053412-2fc7c1 # GPU : AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--gabriellarson--Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-GGUF/snapshots/c324e134daf0a0d4f9e3e136ae525df9fdebea3b/Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--gabriellarson--Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-GGUF/snapshots/c324e134daf0a0d4f9e3e136ae525df9fdebea3b/Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

4703532351180,001.0102.0213.031Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 2.480 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.861 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 303,0 tok/s Generation, 2.253 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.522 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 25,2 tok/s Generation, 243 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 129.179 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 20,2 tok/s Generation, 333 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 137.310 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 19,6 tok/s Generation, 407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 91.059 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 14,3 tok/s Generation, 306 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 40.454 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 42,1 tok/s Generation, 430 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 241.769 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 364,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 303,0 tok/s★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 42,1 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 25,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 20,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 19,6 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 14,3 tok/s

CPUby processor

4703532351180,001.0102.0213.031Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 2.480 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.861 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 303,0 tok/s Generation, 2.253 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.522 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 25,2 tok/s Generation, 243 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 129.179 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 20,2 tok/s Generation, 333 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 137.310 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 19,6 tok/s Generation, 407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 91.059 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 14,3 tok/s Generation, 306 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 40.454 ms (3 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 42,1 tok/s Generation, 430 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 241.769 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 364,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 303,0 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 42,1 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 25,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 20,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 19,6 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 14,3 tok/s

MBby mainboard

4703532351180,001.0102.0213.031Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 2.480 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.861 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 25,2 tok/s Generation, 243 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 129.179 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 20,2 tok/s Generation, 333 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 137.310 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 19,6 tok/s Generation, 407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 91.059 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 14,3 tok/s Generation, 306 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 40.454 ms (3 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 303,0 tok/s Generation, 1.250 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 140.857 ms (20 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 364,1 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 303,0 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 25,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 20,2 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 19,6 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 14,3 tok/s

ENGby engine

4003823643463289751.0171.0581.100Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 1.038 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 115.792 ms (35 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 364,1 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

4003823643463289751.0171.0581.100Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 1.038 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 115.792 ms (35 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 364,1 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 85 W
⚡ TDP 371 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)371 W estimated (TDP)GPU 300 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.11
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 10.14
Token / kWh29.60K
Acquisition (system)EUR 6,824 full priceGPU EUR 1,400 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,774
Output tokens (2 years)192.37M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (85 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLlama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_53x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionLlama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_53x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.