Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512

Performance benchmark · measured on 03.08.2026 13:48

Benchmark-IDrun-20260805-053402-020b6c
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation206,34tok/s
Prefill5.938,16tok/s
Time to First Token44.986,50ms
Total duration296,73s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
29of 123 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 77 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 206,3 tok/s
+38 % vs Ø 149,3
Prefill 5.938,2 tok/s
+115 % vs Ø 2.767,7
Time to First Token 44.987 ms
-62 % vs Ø 117.654
Distribution in the field2 – 667 tok/s
Ø 148 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
RAM: 184 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260805-053402-020b6c
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260805-053402-020b6c # GPU : 3x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores # RAM : 184 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-GGUF/snapshots/6e458b8add42681bfd023de5eab93637694aaf82/Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-GGUF/snapshots/6e458b8add42681bfd023de5eab93637694aaf82/Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

9226914612300,003.3026.6049.906Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 8.070 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.939 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 620,3 tok/s Generation, 6.308 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.898 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 569,7 tok/s Generation, 8.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.901 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 355,4 tok/s Generation, 3.516 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.254 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 108,5 tok/s Generation, 1.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.385 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 206,3 tok/s Generation, 3.603 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.341 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 725,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 620,3 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 569,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 355,4 tok/s★ AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 206,3 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 108,5 tok/s

CPUby processor

9226914612300,003.3026.6049.906Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 8.070 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.939 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 620,3 tok/s Generation, 6.308 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.898 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 569,7 tok/s Generation, 8.224 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.901 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 355,4 tok/s Generation, 3.440 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.876 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 331,6 tok/s Generation, 3.668 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.010 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 108,5 tok/s Generation, 1.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.385 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 206,3 tok/s Generation, 3.603 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.341 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 725,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 620,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 569,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 355,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 331,6 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 206,3 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 108,5 tok/s

MBby mainboard

9226914612300,003.2386.4779.715Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 8.070 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.939 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 620,3 tok/s Generation, 6.308 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.898 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 355,4 tok/s Generation, 3.440 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.876 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 331,6 tok/s Generation, 3.668 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.010 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 108,5 tok/s Generation, 1.619 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.385 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 569,7 tok/s Generation, 5.914 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.121 ms (18 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 725,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 620,3 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 569,7 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 355,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 331,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 108,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

89469048728379,64.0444.7115.3776.044Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 5.018 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.630 ms (7 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 247,7 tok/s Generation, 4.553 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.826 ms (2 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 645,1 tok/s Generation, 5.535 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.930 ms (30 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
vLLM 725,6 tok/s★ llama.cpp 645,1 tok/s this rununbekannt 247,7 tok/s

DRVby driver

7987627266896535.0695.2845.5005.716Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 725,6 tok/s Generation, 5.392 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.204 ms (39 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 725,6 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 125 W
⚡ TDP 971 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)971 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 46 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.39
Token / kWh765.01K
Acquisition (system)EUR 9,674 full priceGPU EUR 4,200 · CPU EUR 1,399 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 2,576 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 14,778
Output tokens (2 years)13.01B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (125 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-25123x AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700Devstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionDevstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionDevstral-Small-2-24B-Instruct-2512NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.