Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMarcel SommerGoogle

gemma-4-E2B-it

Performance benchmark · measured on 03.08.2026 21:37

Benchmark-IDrun-20260804-052133-b7da2b
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense5BRuntime: vLLM
Generation46,20tok/s
Prefill11.058,05tok/s
Time to First Token179,50ms
Total duration44,69s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
377of 609 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 38 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 46,2 tok/s
-58 % vs Ø 110,8
Prefill 11.058,1 tok/s
+274 % vs Ø 2.959,0
Time to First Token 180 ms
-99 % vs Ø 21.670
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 111 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260724-004608-16af9b
404,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-9f766a
395,2 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-d456e7
393,5 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-bffb11
393,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260724-004607-29bd16
388,9 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-1c779f
388,2 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it same modelNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-6ea089
378,6 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it same modelNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-e8b129
377,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-ac388e
362,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-5e5085
361,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105335-653788
359,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105334-2c4905
359,3 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-105334-44d1e7
359,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032119-4852bf
357,1 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti · run-20260804-052133-b7da2b
46,2 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti · 24 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor
RAM: 30 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K

Setup

Runtime: vLLM
Quantization: -
Model: gemma-4-E2B-it

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260804-052133-b7da2b
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : gemma-4-E2B-it # Engine : vLLM # Run-ID : run-20260804-052133-b7da2b # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor # RAM : 30 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /opt/vllm-gemma/venv/bin/python /opt/vllm-gemma/venv/bin/vllm serve google/gemma-4-E2B-it \ --served-model-name gemma-4-E2B-it \ --host 192.168.41.116 \ --port 8000 \ --dtype bfloat16 \ --max-model-len 8192 \ --gpu-memory-utilization 0.90 \ --enforce-eager
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.vllm
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.gemma-4-E2B-it
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.8192
Alias?Anzeigename des Modells nach aussen (served model name), unabhaengig vom Dateinamen.gemma-4-E2B-it
Dtype?Zahlenformat der Modellgewichte bei der Berechnung (z.B. auto, float16, bfloat16). 'auto' waehlt automatisch das vom Modell empfohlene Format.bfloat16
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.8192
GPU-Speicher?Anteil des GPU-Speichers (0 bis 1), den vLLM belegen darf. 0.92 = 92 %. Hoeher = mehr Platz fuer den KV-Cache (mehr/laengere parallele Anfragen), aber groesseres Risiko fuer 'Out of Memory'.0.90
Enforce-Eager?Schaltet die optimierte Graph-Ausfuehrung (CUDA-/HIP-Graphs) AB und rechnet Schritt fuer Schritt. Startet schneller und spart etwas VRAM, ist im laufenden Betrieb aber meist langsamer als mit Graphs.aktiv

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

gemma-4-E2B-it on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

3.0732.3661.65995124406.58613.17319.759Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 11.148 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.175 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 2.414,4 tok/s Generation, 16.315 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.871 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 2.143,6 tok/s Generation, 5.663 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.304 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 1.744,0 tok/s Generation, 15.451 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.253 ms (8 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 903,3 tok/s Generation, 6.421 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.548 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...Intel Arc Pro B70 - 826,2 tok/s Generation, 2.623 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.541 ms (3 Laufe)Intel Arc Pro B70NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 1.492,8 tok/s Generation, 13.345 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.694 ms (8 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 2.491,2 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 2.414,4 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 2.143,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.744,0 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 1.492,8 tok/s this runNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 903,3 tok/sIntel Arc Pro B70 826,2 tok/s

CPUby processor

3.1482.3611.5747870,006.58613.17319.759Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 11.148 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.175 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 2.414,4 tok/s Generation, 16.315 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.871 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 2.143,6 tok/s Generation, 5.663 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.304 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 1.744,0 tok/s Generation, 15.451 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.253 ms (8 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 1.492,8 tok/s Generation, 9.978 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.182 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...NVIDIA Grace - 903,3 tok/s Generation, 6.421 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.548 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA GraceAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 826,2 tok/s Generation, 2.623 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.541 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor - 451,1 tok/s Generation, 15.366 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 801 ms (5 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-C...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 2.491,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 2.414,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 2.143,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1.744,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 1.492,8 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 903,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 826,2 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 451,1 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

3.1482.3611.5747870,006.58613.17319.759Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 11.148 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.175 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 2.414,4 tok/s Generation, 16.315 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.871 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 2.143,6 tok/s Generation, 5.663 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.304 ms (12 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 1.744,0 tok/s Generation, 15.451 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.253 ms (8 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 1.492,8 tok/s Generation, 9.978 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.182 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 903,3 tok/s Generation, 6.421 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.548 ms (4 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) - 826,2 tok/s Generation, 2.623 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.541 ms (3 Laufe)Shenzhen Meigao Elect...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K - 451,1 tok/s Generation, 15.366 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 801 ms (5 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 2.491,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 2.414,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 2.143,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1.744,0 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 1.492,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 903,3 tok/sShenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 826,2 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. PRIME A520M-K 451,1 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

2.9172.4832.0501.6161.1835.41310.50115.59020.678Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 8.221 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.209 ms (33 Laufe)llama.cppvLLM - 1.608,5 tok/s Generation, 17.869 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 785 ms (8 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ vLLM
llama.cpp 2.491,2 tok/s★ vLLM 1.608,5 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

3.0582.3781.6971.0173375.0567.3269.59711.867Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 2.491,2 tok/s Generation, 10.502 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.783 ms (37 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 903,3 tok/s Generation, 6.421 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.548 ms (4 Laufe)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...
unbekannt 2.491,2 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 903,3 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 25 W
⚡ TDP 450 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)450 W estimated (TDP)GPU 450 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.14
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.81
Token / kWh369.60K
Acquisition (system)EUR 1,149 partial priceGPU EUR 999 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 3,514
Output tokens (2 years)2.91B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (25 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Tigemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Editiongemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090gemma-4-E2B-it3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Marcel Sommer

@marcelsommer