Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 31.07.2026 01:31

Benchmark-IDrun-20260731-071600-51ca70
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense72BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation2,83tok/s
Prefill165,61tok/s
Time to First Token56.632,00ms
Total duration1.200,00s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
57of 59 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 3 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 2,8 tok/s
-100 % vs Ø 978,2
Prefill 165,6 tok/s
-98 % vs Ø 8.166,5
Time to First Token 56.632 ms
+18 % vs Ø 48.125
Distribution in the field1 – 2.491 tok/s
Ø 962 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · 32 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor
RAM: 126 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260731-071600-51ca70
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260731-071600-51ca70 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 # CPU : AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor # RAM : 126 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/d43fd973131bce821f41e2df3c78c6fe15c5627a/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 30 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/d43fd973131bce821f41e2df3c78c6fe15c5627a/Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.30
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen2.5-72B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

31023315577,60,009321.8632.795Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 239,2 tok/s Generation, 2.275 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.196 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 203,8 tok/s Generation, 2.269 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.754 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 5,8 tok/s Generation, 159 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.383 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 4,9 tok/s Generation, 209 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.676 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 3,0 tok/s Generation, 147 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.799 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 239,2 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 203,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 5,8 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 4,9 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 3,0 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

31023315577,60,009321.8632.795Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 239,2 tok/s Generation, 2.275 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.196 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 203,8 tok/s Generation, 2.269 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.754 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 5,8 tok/s Generation, 159 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.383 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 4,9 tok/s Generation, 209 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.676 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 3,0 tok/s Generation, 147 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.799 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 239,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 203,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 5,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 4,9 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 3,0 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

31023315577,60,009321.8632.795Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 239,2 tok/s Generation, 2.275 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.196 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 203,8 tok/s Generation, 2.269 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.754 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 5,8 tok/s Generation, 159 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.383 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 4,9 tok/s Generation, 209 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.676 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 3,0 tok/s Generation, 147 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 42.799 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 239,2 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 203,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 5,8 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 4,9 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 3,0 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

2632512392272151.2891.3441.3991.454Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 239,2 tok/s Generation, 1.371 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 29.617 ms (21 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 239,2 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

2632512392272151.2891.3441.3991.454Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 239,2 tok/s Generation, 1.371 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 29.617 ms (21 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 239,2 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 72 W
⚡ TDP 622 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)622 W estimated (TDP)GPU 575 + CPU 35 + Board 12 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.19
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 18.30
Token / kWh16.39K
Acquisition (system)EUR 4,986 full priceGPU EUR 3,300 · CPU EUR 349 · Board EUR 149 · RAM EUR 1,008 · PSU EUR 180
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 8,253
Output tokens (2 years)178.49M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (72 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen2.5-72B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen2.5-72B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen2.5-72B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen2.5-72B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.