Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 30.07.2026 16:30

Benchmark-IDrun-20260730-181641-b834fb
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense32BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation64,60tok/s
Prefill2.989,09tok/s
Time to First Token821,50ms
Total duration33,36s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
117of 149 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 21 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 64,6 tok/s
-63 % vs Ø 173,7
Prefill 2.989,1 tok/s
-36 % vs Ø 4.655,5
Time to First Token 822 ms
-2 % vs Ø 840
Distribution in the field12 – 362 tok/s
Ø 174 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-ac388e
362,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-5e5085
361,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-a2f36d
356,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-1be57b
355,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-b63d5d
350,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-74868e
350,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-120dc2
348,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184455-9cb45c
343,9 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105339-e213a2
331,0 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-e34cf0
330,8 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-3ddb51
330,2 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105339-133b6a
330,1 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-f734f1
330,0 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-508364
329,9 tok/s
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct this run3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260730-181641-b834fb
64,6 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260730-181641-b834fb
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260730-181641-b834fb # GPU : 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores # RAM : 125 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/40b525506a4f98ed425882fa6dfc90cc8139065e/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/40b525506a4f98ed425882fa6dfc90cc8139065e/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

6474853231620,001.8193.6385.456Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 500,6 tok/s Generation, 4.446 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.330 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 479,6 tok/s Generation, 4.242 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.075 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 236,4 tok/s Generation, 2.040 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.899 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 63,2 tok/s Generation, 2.588 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.127 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 45,3 tok/s Generation, 587 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.842 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 20,6 tok/s Generation, 518 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.112 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 412,8 tok/s Generation, 4.476 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.913 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 500,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 479,6 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 412,8 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 236,4 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 63,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 45,3 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 20,6 tok/s

CPUby processor

6474853231620,001.8193.6385.456Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 500,6 tok/s Generation, 4.446 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.330 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 479,6 tok/s Generation, 4.242 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.075 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 236,4 tok/s Generation, 2.040 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.899 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 63,2 tok/s Generation, 2.588 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.127 ms (10 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 45,3 tok/s Generation, 587 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.842 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 20,6 tok/s Generation, 518 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.112 ms (3 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 412,8 tok/s Generation, 4.476 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.913 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 500,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 479,6 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 412,8 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 236,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 63,2 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 45,3 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 20,6 tok/s

MBby mainboard

6474853231620,001.8063.6135.419Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 500,6 tok/s Generation, 4.446 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.330 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 479,6 tok/s Generation, 4.242 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.075 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 236,4 tok/s Generation, 2.040 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.899 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 45,3 tok/s Generation, 587 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.842 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 20,6 tok/s Generation, 518 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.112 ms (3 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 412,8 tok/s Generation, 3.482 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.289 ms (19 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 500,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 479,6 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 412,8 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 236,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 45,3 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 20,6 tok/s

ENGby engine

5555224904584252.0413.3364.6315.926Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 500,6 tok/s Generation, 5.183 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.853 ms (5 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 479,6 tok/s Generation, 2.784 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.375 ms (32 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
vLLM 500,6 tok/s★ llama.cpp 479,6 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

5515265014764512.9213.0463.1703.294Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 500,6 tok/s Generation, 3.108 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.007 ms (37 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 500,6 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 165 W
⚡ TDP 983 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)983 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 57 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 1.27
Token / kWh236.70K
Acquisition (system)EUR 45,748 full priceGPU EUR 39,000 · CPU EUR 3,499 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 1,750 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 50,912
Output tokens (2 years)4.07B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (165 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.