Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

OpenReasoning-Nemotron-32B

Performance benchmark · measured on 30.07.2026 07:45

Benchmark-IDrun-20260730-084906-03b30c
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense32BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation57,37tok/s
Prefill2.309,10tok/s
Time to First Token1.055,50ms
Total duration37,82s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
124of 139 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 11 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 57,4 tok/s
-68 % vs Ø 176,8
Prefill 2.309,1 tok/s
-51 % vs Ø 4.723,6
Time to First Token 1.056 ms
+24 % vs Ø 852
Distribution in the field12 – 362 tok/s
Ø 177 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-ac388e
362,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-5e5085
361,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-a2f36d
356,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-1be57b
355,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-b63d5d
350,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-74868e
350,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-120dc2
348,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184455-9cb45c
343,9 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105339-e213a2
331,0 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-e34cf0
330,8 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-3ddb51
330,2 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105339-133b6a
330,1 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-f734f1
330,0 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-508364
329,9 tok/s
OpenReasoning-Nemotron-32B this run3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260730-084906-03b30c
57,4 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260730-084906-03b30c
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : OpenReasoning-Nemotron-32B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260730-084906-03b30c # GPU : 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores # RAM : 125 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--gabriellarson--OpenReasoning-Nemotron-32B-GGUF/snapshots/56ebd68caf9cf4b656f46e5aad225420dd6b71d4/OpenReasoning-Nemotron-32B-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias OpenReasoning-Nemotron-32B \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.OpenReasoning-Nemotron-32B
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--gabriellarson--OpenReasoning-Nemotron-32B-GGUF/snapshots/56ebd68caf9cf4b656f46e5aad225420dd6b71d4/OpenReasoning-Nemotron-32B-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

OpenReasoning-Nemotron-32B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

6254693131560,001.8603.7215.581Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 481,0 tok/s Generation, 3.983 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.140 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 480,0 tok/s Generation, 4.502 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.693 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 236,8 tok/s Generation, 2.036 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.847 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 64,3 tok/s Generation, 3.816 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.428 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 49,9 tok/s Generation, 621 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 94.653 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 21,1 tok/s Generation, 429 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.251 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...CPU-only - 1,1 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 266.668 ms (1 Lauf)CPU-onlyNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 411,7 tok/s Generation, 4.317 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.939 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 481,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 480,0 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 411,7 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 236,8 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 64,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 49,9 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 21,1 tok/sCPU-only 1,1 tok/s

CPUby processor

6254693131560,001.8603.7215.581Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 481,0 tok/s Generation, 3.983 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.140 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 480,0 tok/s Generation, 4.502 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.693 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 236,8 tok/s Generation, 2.036 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.847 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 64,3 tok/s Generation, 3.816 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.428 ms (2 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 49,9 tok/s Generation, 621 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 94.653 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 21,1 tok/s Generation, 429 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.251 ms (2 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 1,1 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 266.668 ms (1 Lauf)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 411,7 tok/s Generation, 4.317 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.939 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 481,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 480,0 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 411,7 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 236,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 64,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 49,9 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 21,1 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 1,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

6254693131560,001.8603.7215.581Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 481,0 tok/s Generation, 3.983 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.140 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 480,0 tok/s Generation, 4.502 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.693 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 236,8 tok/s Generation, 2.036 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.847 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 49,9 tok/s Generation, 621 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 94.653 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 21,1 tok/s Generation, 429 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.251 ms (2 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 1,1 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 266.668 ms (1 Lauf)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 411,7 tok/s Generation, 4.225 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.755 ms (11 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 481,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 480,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 411,7 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 236,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 49,9 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 21,1 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 1,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

5295054814574332.9203.0443.1693.293Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)llama.cpp - 481,0 tok/s Generation, 3.107 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.595 ms (26 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 481,0 tok/s this run

DRVby driver

5295054814574332.9203.0443.1693.293Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 481,0 tok/s Generation, 3.107 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 31.595 ms (26 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 481,0 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 165 W
⚡ TDP 983 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)983 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 57 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 1.43
Token / kWh210.21K
Acquisition (system)EUR 45,748 full priceGPU EUR 39,000 · CPU EUR 3,499 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 1,750 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 50,912
Output tokens (2 years)3.62B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (165 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

OpenReasoning-Nemotron-32B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionOpenReasoning-Nemotron-32BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090OpenReasoning-Nemotron-32BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionOpenReasoning-Nemotron-32B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.