Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaGoogle

gemma-4-E4B-it

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 22:14

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-224611-e52687
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense8BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
For context: Diese Plattform nutzt Unified Memory – die "VRAM" ist gemeinsamer System-RAM (APU/Superchip); das Modell teilt sich den Speicher mit dem System.
Generation267,65tok/s
Prefill1.544,48tok/s
Time to First Token9.961,50ms
Total duration80,90s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
234of 440 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 47 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 267,7 tok/s
-33 % vs Ø 401,8
Prefill 1.544,5 tok/s
-73 % vs Ø 5.729,3
Time to First Token 9.962 ms
-55 % vs Ø 22.050
Distribution in the field0 – 1.349 tok/s
Ø 401 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-0adf6d
1.349,3 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-5b4937
1.301,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-30d864
1.188,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-5432cd
1.164,8 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-9e81f9
1.136,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-058a31
1.113,5 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-305ad6
1.007,8 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-4b8514
1.007,3 tok/s
gemma-4-E4B-it this run2× AMD Radeon Graphics · run-20260729-224611-e52687
267,7 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-224611-e52687
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : gemma-4-E4B-it # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-224611-e52687 # GPU : 2x AMD Radeon Graphics # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 29 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--gemma-4-E4B-it-GGUF/snapshots/bfc15c382204943c3a8fff0c750b94ae2364d7a3/gemma-4-E4B-it-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias gemma-4-E4B-it \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.gemma-4-E4B-it
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--gemma-4-E4B-it-GGUF/snapshots/bfc15c382204943c3a8fff0c750b94ae2364d7a3/gemma-4-E4B-it-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

gemma-4-E4B-it on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1911.6541.11757942,104.9099.81714.726Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.758,6 tok/s Generation, 12.085 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.684 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.606,1 tok/s Generation, 8.848 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.968 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.423,3 tok/s Generation, 5.611 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.220 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 1.082,4 tok/s Generation, 9.183 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.840 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 983,7 tok/s Generation, 6.659 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.857 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) - 484,8 tok/s Generation, 3.369 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.554 ms (5 Laufe)NVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spar...AMD Radeon Graphics - 474,8 tok/s Generation, 1.442 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.922 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Radeon Graphics
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.758,6 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.606,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.423,3 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 1.082,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 983,7 tok/sNVIDIA GB10 (DGX Spark) 484,8 tok/s★ AMD Radeon Graphics 474,8 tok/s this run

CPUby processor

2.1911.6541.11757942,104.9099.81714.726Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.758,6 tok/s Generation, 12.085 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.684 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.606,1 tok/s Generation, 8.848 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.968 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.423,3 tok/s Generation, 5.611 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.220 ms (12 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 1.082,4 tok/s Generation, 9.183 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.840 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 983,7 tok/s Generation, 6.659 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.857 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...NVIDIA Grace - 484,8 tok/s Generation, 3.369 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.554 ms (5 Laufe)NVIDIA GraceAMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics - 474,8 tok/s Generation, 1.442 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.922 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.758,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.606,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.423,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 1.082,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 983,7 tok/sNVIDIA Grace 484,8 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with Radeon Graphics 474,8 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

2.1911.6541.11757942,104.9099.81714.726Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.758,6 tok/s Generation, 12.085 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.684 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.606,1 tok/s Generation, 8.848 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.968 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.423,3 tok/s Generation, 5.611 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.220 ms (12 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 1.082,4 tok/s Generation, 9.183 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.840 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 983,7 tok/s Generation, 6.659 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.857 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 - 484,8 tok/s Generation, 3.369 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.554 ms (5 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) - 474,8 tok/s Generation, 1.442 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.922 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Shenzhen Meigao Elect...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.758,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.606,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.423,3 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 1.082,4 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 983,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. GX10 484,8 tok/s★ Shenzhen Meigao Electronic Equipment Co.,Ltd DRFXI (MotherBoard Series) 474,8 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

2.0821.7361.3911.0457003.7207.58611.45115.317Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 1.022,8 tok/s Generation, 13.200 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.096 ms (3 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.758,6 tok/s Generation, 5.837 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.889 ms (32 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.758,6 tok/s this runvLLM 1.022,8 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.1891.6551.12258854,22.2994.2186.1368.055Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.758,6 tok/s Generation, 6.985 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.799 ms (30 Laufe)unbekanntNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 - 484,8 tok/s Generation, 3.369 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.554 ms (5 Laufe)NVIDIA 590.48.01 / CU...
unbekannt 1.758,6 tok/sNVIDIA 590.48.01 / CUDA 13.1 484,8 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🔌 Idle 0 W
⚡ TDP 10 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)0 W missing
Avg cost / hour
Electricity / 1M tokens
Token / kWh
Acquisition (system) missing
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)
Output tokens (2 years)16.88B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)
No power draw measured – values estimated from GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board.

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (0 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

gemma-4-E4B-it2x AMD Radeon Graphicsgemma-4-E4B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Editiongemma-4-E4B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090gemma-4-E4B-it3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.