Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 11:01

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-122848-5e237b
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense49BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation4,61tok/s
Prefill383,69tok/s
Time to First Token6.370,50ms
Total duration456,93s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
1388of 1559 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 11 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 4,6 tok/s
-94 % vs Ø 79,0
Prefill 383,7 tok/s
-86 % vs Ø 2.834,3
Time to First Token 6.371 ms
-76 % vs Ø 26.805
Distribution in the field0 – 405 tok/s
Ø 79 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-122848-5e237b
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-122848-5e237b # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 92 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--gabriellarson--Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-GGUF/snapshots/c324e134daf0a0d4f9e3e136ae525df9fdebea3b/Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 60 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--gabriellarson--Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-GGUF/snapshots/c324e134daf0a0d4f9e3e136ae525df9fdebea3b/Llama-3_3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1_5-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.60
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

4713532351180,001.0242.0473.071Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 2.480 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.861 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 303,0 tok/s Generation, 2.253 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.522 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 197,3 tok/s Generation, 2.201 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.347 ms (12 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 71,0 tok/s Generation, 517 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 24.661 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 25,2 tok/s Generation, 243 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 129.179 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 20,2 tok/s Generation, 333 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 137.310 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 11,6 tok/s Generation, 23 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 293.489 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 19,6 tok/s Generation, 407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 91.059 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 364,1 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 303,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 197,3 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 71,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 25,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 20,2 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 19,6 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 11,6 tok/s

CPUby processor

4693522351170,001.0052.0103.015Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 2.480 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.861 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 303,0 tok/s Generation, 2.253 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.522 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 197,3 tok/s Generation, 1.267 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 136.837 ms (21 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 71,0 tok/s Generation, 380 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 76.920 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 20,2 tok/s Generation, 333 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 137.310 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 19,6 tok/s Generation, 407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 91.059 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 364,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 303,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 197,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 71,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 20,2 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 19,6 tok/s this run

MBby mainboard

4693522351170,001.0052.0103.015Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 2.480 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.861 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 303,0 tok/s Generation, 1.563 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 101.042 ms (30 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 71,0 tok/s Generation, 380 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 76.920 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 20,2 tok/s Generation, 333 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 137.310 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 19,6 tok/s Generation, 407 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 91.059 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Meigao Innovation Tec...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 364,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 303,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 71,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 20,2 tok/s★ Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 19,6 tok/s this run

ENGby engine

4343572812041273291.5832.8384.092Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 197,3 tok/s Generation, 3.442 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.578 ms (6 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 979 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 107.487 ms (39 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 364,1 tok/s this runvLLM 197,3 tok/s

DRVby driver

4003823643463281.2291.2811.3341.386Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 364,1 tok/s Generation, 1.307 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 93.766 ms (45 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 364,1 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 50 W
⚡ TDP 477 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)477 W estimated (TDP)GPU 450 + CPU 17 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.14
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 8.63
Token / kWh34.77K
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,986 partial priceGPU EUR 999 · CPU EUR 549 · RAM EUR 1,288 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 5,494
Output tokens (2 years)290.76M
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (50 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Llama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 TiLlama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.5NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionLlama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.53x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionLlama-3.3-Nemotron-Super-49B-v1.53x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.