Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 10:50

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-105343-b7b724
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation796,67tok/s
Prefill9.853,86tok/s
Time to First Token2.683,00ms
Total duration25,75s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
51of 172 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 71 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 796,7 tok/s
+50 % vs Ø 530,0
Prefill 9.853,9 tok/s
+44 % vs Ø 6.861,3
Time to First Token 2.683 ms
-59 % vs Ø 6.521
Distribution in the field32 – 1.196 tok/s
Ø 530 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-437388
989,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-8b6146
970,4 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-310458
946,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-c65107
931,3 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-60b672
930,9 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-88bf57
929,1 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-86d336
928,5 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-9ec82f
927,0 tok/s
Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct this run3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105343-b7b724
796,7 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Hardware

GPU: 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · 96 GB VRAM
CPU: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores
RAM: 125 GB
Mainboard: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE

Setup

Runtime: llama.cpp
Quantization: Q4_K_M
Model: Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-105343-b7b724
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-105343-b7b724 # GPU : 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores # RAM : 125 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--noctrex--Huihui-Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct-abliterated-GGUF/snapshots/6f9740ab52d5cefac63d89b65de95c12b48d49a6/Huihui-Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct-abliterated-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--noctrex--Huihui-Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct-abliterated-GGUF/snapshots/6f9740ab52d5cefac63d89b65de95c12b48d49a6/Huihui-Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct-abliterated-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1351.6011.0675340,006.96613.93220.898Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.329 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.639,0 tok/s Generation, 17.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.966 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 903,5 tok/s Generation, 5.934 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.817 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 763,5 tok/s Generation, 14.375 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.665 ms (36 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 245,1 tok/s Generation, 4.091 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.139 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 233,0 tok/s Generation, 3.940 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.809 ms (4 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 154,0 tok/s Generation, 1.182 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 22.532 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 3.530 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 44.809 ms (20 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.505,0 tok/s Generation, 12.905 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.350 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.655,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.639,0 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.505,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 903,5 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 763,5 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 245,1 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 233,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 154,0 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 89,8 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.1041.5781.0525260,006.85913.71820.578Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.329 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.639,0 tok/s Generation, 17.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.966 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 903,5 tok/s Generation, 5.934 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.817 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 763,5 tok/s Generation, 10.502 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.073 ms (56 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 245,1 tok/s Generation, 2.962 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.329 ms (16 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.505,0 tok/s Generation, 12.905 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.350 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.655,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.639,0 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.505,0 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 903,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 763,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 245,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.1041.5781.0525260,006.85913.71820.578Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.318 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.329 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.639,0 tok/s Generation, 17.025 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.966 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 903,5 tok/s Generation, 5.934 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.817 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 245,1 tok/s Generation, 2.962 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.329 ms (16 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.505,0 tok/s Generation, 10.834 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.173 ms (65 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.655,9 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.639,0 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.505,0 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 903,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 245,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.1351.6011.0675340,03.1657.91112.65717.403Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 1.028,5 tok/s Generation, 14.863 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.006 ms (31 Laufe)vLLMunbekannt - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 5.705 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 549 ms (7 Laufe)unbekanntllama.cpp - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 7.252 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 20.449 ms (55 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.655,9 tok/s this runvLLM 1.028,5 tok/sunbekannt 89,8 tok/s

DRVby driver

2.1351.6011.0675340,04.3336.6789.02311.367Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.655,9 tok/s Generation, 9.995 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.801 ms (86 Laufe)unbekanntAMD 7.0.0-27-generic - 89,8 tok/s Generation, 5.705 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 549 ms (7 Laufe)AMD 7.0.0-27-generic
unbekannt 1.655,9 tok/sAMD 7.0.0-27-generic 89,8 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 165 W
⚡ TDP 983 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)983 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 57 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.10
Token / kWh2.92M
Acquisition (system)EUR 45,748 full priceGPU EUR 39,000 · CPU EUR 3,499 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 1,750 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 50,912
Output tokens (2 years)50.25B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (165 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen3-VL-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3-VL-30B-A3B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3-VL-30B-A3B-Instruct3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.