Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 10:24

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-105342-b71814
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation816,46tok/s
Prefill11.470,88tok/s
Time to First Token2.673,50ms
Total duration24,84s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
40of 131 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 70 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 816,5 tok/s
+44 % vs Ø 566,7
Prefill 11.470,9 tok/s
+45 % vs Ø 7.903,3
Time to First Token 2.674 ms
-55 % vs Ø 5.968
Distribution in the field30 – 1.196 tok/s
Ø 567 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-437388
989,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-8b6146
970,4 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-310458
946,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-c65107
931,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-60b672
930,9 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-88bf57
929,1 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-86d336
928,5 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-9ec82f
927,0 tok/s
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 this run3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105342-b71814
816,5 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-105342-b71814
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-105342-b71814 # GPU : 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores # RAM : 125 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-GGUF/snapshots/a9b37aaac12b2bd0098783a443429543dd76a14d/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--unsloth--Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-GGUF/snapshots/a9b37aaac12b2bd0098783a443429543dd76a14d/Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1871.6401.0945470,007.58515.17022.756Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 14.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.214 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.670,5 tok/s Generation, 18.362 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.942 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 930,6 tok/s Generation, 7.726 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.880 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 231,1 tok/s Generation, 4.165 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.837 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 155,8 tok/s Generation, 1.078 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.667 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 131,2 tok/s Generation, 1.375 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.315 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...CPU-only - 8,5 tok/s Generation, 74 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 134.321 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.521,4 tok/s Generation, 10.574 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.521 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.683,8 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.670,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.521,4 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 930,6 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 231,1 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 155,8 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 131,2 tok/sCPU-only 8,5 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.1871.6401.0945470,007.58515.17022.756Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 14.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.214 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.670,5 tok/s Generation, 18.362 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.942 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 930,6 tok/s Generation, 7.726 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.880 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 231,1 tok/s Generation, 4.165 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.837 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 155,8 tok/s Generation, 1.078 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.667 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 131,2 tok/s Generation, 1.375 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.315 ms (3 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 8,5 tok/s Generation, 74 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 134.321 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.521,4 tok/s Generation, 10.574 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.521 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.683,8 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.670,5 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.521,4 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 930,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 231,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 155,8 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 131,2 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 8,5 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.1871.6401.0945470,007.58515.17022.756Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 14.349 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.214 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.670,5 tok/s Generation, 18.362 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.942 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 930,6 tok/s Generation, 7.726 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.880 ms (6 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 155,8 tok/s Generation, 1.078 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 23.667 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 131,2 tok/s Generation, 1.375 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 8.315 ms (3 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 8,5 tok/s Generation, 74 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 134.321 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.521,4 tok/s Generation, 8.010 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.247 ms (15 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.683,8 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.670,5 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.521,4 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 930,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 155,8 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 131,2 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 8,5 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.0081.6511.2959395823.8907.75711.62415.492Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 906,0 tok/s Generation, 13.366 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.732 ms (14 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 6.015 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 19.761 ms (31 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.683,8 tok/s this runvLLM 906,0 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.8521.7681.6841.6001.5157.8048.1368.4688.800Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.683,8 tok/s Generation, 8.302 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 15.085 ms (45 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.683,8 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 165 W
⚡ TDP 983 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)983 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 57 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.10
Token / kWh2.99M
Acquisition (system)EUR 45,748 full priceGPU EUR 39,000 · CPU EUR 3,499 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 1,750 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 50,912
Output tokens (2 years)51.50B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (165 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-25073x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-25073x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.