Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaQwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 10:16

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-105341-5cfa7f
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation1.507,51tok/s
Prefill16.411,59tok/s
Time to First Token7.064,50ms
Total duration42,90s
Concurrency10parallel
Ranking in the field
39of 131 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 10× concurrent

This run is better than 71 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 1.507,5 tok/s
+47 % vs Ø 1.022,8
Prefill 16.411,6 tok/s
+90 % vs Ø 8.634,9
Time to First Token 7.065 ms
-61 % vs Ø 17.912
Distribution in the field40 – 2.144 tok/s
Ø 1.023 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-d87c73
2.143,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-0aed86
1.937,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-8db0fa
1.911,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-e0eafd
1.897,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-26063b
1.835,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-a77046
1.830,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-c6e7e0
1.819,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-2b99aa
1.802,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-1cc62d
1.742,1 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-3fa079
1.655,2 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-be087a
1.654,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-2fab14
1.651,0 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-b8a790
1.650,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-34c4d6
1.649,9 tok/s
Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 this run3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-5cfa7f
1.507,5 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 10× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-105341-5cfa7f
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-105341-5cfa7f # GPU : 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores # RAM : 125 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Qwen_Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507-GGUF/snapshots/6c6e8692f43e4ca663f7ece8229a1361090d3a4c/Qwen_Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--bartowski--Qwen_Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507-GGUF/snapshots/6c6e8692f43e4ca663f7ece8229a1361090d3a4c/Qwen_Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507-Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.1711.6281.0855430,006.26012.52018.780Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.671,0 tok/s Generation, 15.160 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.212 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.658,1 tok/s Generation, 15.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.030 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 905,1 tok/s Generation, 8.498 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.639 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 191,9 tok/s Generation, 3.790 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.490 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 152,7 tok/s Generation, 1.209 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 22.640 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 68,6 tok/s Generation, 1.178 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.842 ms (1 Lauf)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...CPU-only - 7,1 tok/s Generation, 102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 109.338 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.515,7 tok/s Generation, 13.445 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.300 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.671,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.658,1 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.515,7 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 905,1 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 191,9 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 152,7 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 68,6 tok/sCPU-only 7,1 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.1711.6281.0855430,006.26012.52018.780Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.671,0 tok/s Generation, 15.160 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.212 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.658,1 tok/s Generation, 15.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.030 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 905,1 tok/s Generation, 8.498 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.639 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 191,9 tok/s Generation, 3.790 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.490 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 152,7 tok/s Generation, 1.209 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 22.640 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 68,6 tok/s Generation, 1.178 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.842 ms (1 Lauf)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 7,1 tok/s Generation, 102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 109.338 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.515,7 tok/s Generation, 13.445 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.300 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.671,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.658,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.515,7 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 905,1 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 191,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 152,7 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 68,6 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 7,1 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.1711.6281.0855430,006.26012.52018.780Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.671,0 tok/s Generation, 15.160 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.212 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.658,1 tok/s Generation, 15.099 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.030 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 905,1 tok/s Generation, 8.498 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.639 ms (6 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 152,7 tok/s Generation, 1.209 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 22.640 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 68,6 tok/s Generation, 1.178 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.842 ms (1 Lauf)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 7,1 tok/s Generation, 102 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 109.338 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.515,7 tok/s Generation, 9.997 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.010 ms (14 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.671,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.658,1 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.515,7 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 905,1 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 152,7 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 68,6 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 7,1 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.9801.6481.3169846536.5768.63610.69612.756Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 961,5 tok/s Generation, 11.434 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.438 ms (14 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.671,0 tok/s Generation, 7.898 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 18.036 ms (28 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.671,0 tok/s this runvLLM 961,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.8381.7551.6711.5871.5048.5328.8959.2589.622Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.671,0 tok/s Generation, 9.077 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.503 ms (42 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.671,0 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (10× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 165 W
⚡ TDP 983 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)983 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 57 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.054
Token / kWh5.52M
Acquisition (system)EUR 45,748 full priceGPU EUR 39,000 · CPU EUR 3,499 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 1,750 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 50,912
Output tokens (2 years)95.08B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (165 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-25073x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionQwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionQwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-25073x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.