Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaNVIDIA

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 10:04

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-105340-e34cf0
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)MoE30BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation330,76tok/s
Prefill5.146,97tok/s
Time to First Token418,00ms
Total duration7,03s
Concurrency1parallel
Ranking in the field
10of 124 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 1× concurrent

This run is better than 93 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 330,8 tok/s
+77 % vs Ø 186,6
Prefill 5.147,0 tok/s
+4 % vs Ø 4.972,1
Time to First Token 418 ms
-48 % vs Ø 808
Distribution in the field12 – 362 tok/s
Ø 187 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-ac388e
362,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-5e5085
361,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-a2f36d
356,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-1be57b
355,6 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-b63d5d
350,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-74868e
350,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-120dc2
348,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184455-9cb45c
343,9 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105339-e213a2
331,0 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B this run3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-e34cf0
330,8 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-3ddb51
330,2 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105339-133b6a
330,1 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B same model3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-f734f1
330,0 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-508364
329,9 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 1× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-105340-e34cf0
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-105340-e34cf0 # GPU : 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores # RAM : 125 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/3730de2284499e33be97bb6e63efe1ec183abba2/nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16.Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/3730de2284499e33be97bb6e63efe1ec183abba2/nvidia.NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-BF16.Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

2.3041.7281.1525760,004.4588.91713.375Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 9.352 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.935 ms (6 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 1.722,1 tok/s Generation, 5.965 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.591 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 897,5 tok/s Generation, 3.908 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.463 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 274,0 tok/s Generation, 10.797 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.446 ms (4 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 263,3 tok/s Generation, 688 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.273 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 118,7 tok/s Generation, 1.158 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.116 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...CPU-only - 6,6 tok/s Generation, 72 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.051 ms (3 Laufe)CPU-onlyNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 1.654,6 tok/s Generation, 8.091 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.398 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.773,5 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.722,1 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.654,6 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 897,5 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 274,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 263,3 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 118,7 tok/sCPU-only 6,6 tok/s

CPUby processor

2.3041.7281.1525760,004.4588.91713.375Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 9.352 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.935 ms (6 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 1.722,1 tok/s Generation, 5.965 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.591 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 897,5 tok/s Generation, 3.908 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.463 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 274,0 tok/s Generation, 10.797 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.446 ms (4 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 263,3 tok/s Generation, 688 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.273 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 118,7 tok/s Generation, 1.158 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.116 ms (6 Laufe)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 6,6 tok/s Generation, 72 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.051 ms (3 Laufe)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 1.654,6 tok/s Generation, 8.091 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.398 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.773,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.722,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.654,6 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 897,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 274,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 263,3 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 118,7 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 6,6 tok/s

MBby mainboard

2.3041.7281.1525760,003.8617.72211.583Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 9.352 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.935 ms (6 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 1.722,1 tok/s Generation, 5.965 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.591 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 897,5 tok/s Generation, 3.908 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.463 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 263,3 tok/s Generation, 688 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 27.273 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 118,7 tok/s Generation, 1.158 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 9.116 ms (6 Laufe)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 6,6 tok/s Generation, 72 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 131.051 ms (3 Laufe)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 1.654,6 tok/s Generation, 8.923 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.105 ms (13 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.773,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.722,1 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.654,6 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 897,5 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 263,3 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 118,7 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 6,6 tok/s

ENGby engine

2.1991.6761.1546311082.0016.69411.38616.079Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 533,5 tok/s Generation, 13.615 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 2.206 ms (5 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 4.465 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 18.961 ms (32 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 1.773,5 tok/s this runvLLM 533,5 tok/s

DRVby driver

1.9511.8621.7741.6851.5965.3605.5885.8166.044Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 1.773,5 tok/s Generation, 5.702 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 16.697 ms (37 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 1.773,5 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (1× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 165 W
⚡ TDP 983 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)983 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 57 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.25
Token / kWh1.21M
Acquisition (system)EUR 45,748 full priceGPU EUR 39,000 · CPU EUR 3,499 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 1,750 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 50,912
Output tokens (2 years)20.86B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (165 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.