Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaMistral AI

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 09:01

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-105338-cbed67
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)Dense24BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K
Generation312,71tok/s
Prefill9.687,96tok/s
Time to First Token4.882,00ms
Total duration62,09s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
91of 131 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 31 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 312,7 tok/s
-45 % vs Ø 566,7
Prefill 9.688,0 tok/s
+23 % vs Ø 7.903,3
Time to First Token 4.882 ms
-18 % vs Ø 5.968
Distribution in the field30 – 1.196 tok/s
Ø 567 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-034052-437388
989,7 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-8b6146
970,4 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032120-310458
946,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-c65107
931,3 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-60b672
930,9 tok/s
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105341-88bf57
929,1 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-86d336
928,5 tok/s
Nemotron-Cascade-2-30B-A3B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105340-9ec82f
927,0 tok/s
Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 this run3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-105338-cbed67
312,7 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-105338-cbed67
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-105338-cbed67 # GPU : 3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition # CPU : AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores # RAM : 125 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /home/godcore/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--mrfakename--mistral-small-3.1-24b-instruct-2503-gguf/snapshots/72af174a032b5788b9c88b3c8907ab1363ef7f69/ggml-model-Q4_K.gguf \ --alias Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./home/godcore/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--mrfakename--mistral-small-3.1-24b-instruct-2503-gguf/snapshots/72af174a032b5788b9c88b3c8907ab1363ef7f69/ggml-model-Q4_K.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503 on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

8866654432220,003.4246.84710.271Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 684,1 tok/s Generation, 5.919 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.904 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 337,4 tok/s Generation, 3.405 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.083 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 117,6 tok/s Generation, 1.566 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.087 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 73,6 tok/s Generation, 2.460 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.522 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics - 14,8 tok/s Generation, 410 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.067 ms (1 Lauf)AMD Radeon 8060S Grap...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 594,0 tok/s Generation, 7.898 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.966 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 684,1 tok/s★ NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 594,0 tok/s this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 337,4 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 117,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 88,3 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 73,6 tok/sAMD Radeon 8060S Graphics 14,8 tok/s

CPUby processor

8866654432220,003.4246.84710.271Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 684,1 tok/s Generation, 5.919 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.904 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 337,4 tok/s Generation, 3.405 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.083 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 117,6 tok/s Generation, 1.566 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.087 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 73,6 tok/s Generation, 2.460 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 3.522 ms (5 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S - 14,8 tok/s Generation, 410 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.067 ms (1 Lauf)AMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 594,0 tok/s Generation, 7.898 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 7.966 ms (9 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 684,1 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 594,0 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 337,4 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 117,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 88,3 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 73,6 tok/sAMD RYZEN AI MAX+ 395 w/ Radeon 8060S 14,8 tok/s

MBby mainboard

8866654432220,003.4246.84710.271Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 684,1 tok/s Generation, 5.919 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.904 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 337,4 tok/s Generation, 3.405 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 14.083 ms (3 Laufe)Meigao Innovation Tec...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 117,6 tok/s Generation, 1.566 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 37.087 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Bosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) - 14,8 tok/s Generation, 410 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 5.067 ms (1 Lauf)Bosgame AXB35-02 (Bey...ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 594,0 tok/s Generation, 5.956 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 6.379 ms (14 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 684,1 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 594,0 tok/s this runMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 337,4 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 117,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 88,3 tok/sBosgame AXB35-02 (BeyondMax Series) 14,8 tok/s

ENGby engine

8726544362180,03.7245.6407.5569.472Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 88,3 tok/s Generation, 8.343 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 1.652 ms (3 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 684,1 tok/s Generation, 4.853 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 11.191 ms (24 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 684,1 tok/s this runvLLM 88,3 tok/s

DRVby driver

7527186846506164.9265.1365.3455.555Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 684,1 tok/s Generation, 5.241 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.131 ms (27 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 684,1 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 165 W
⚡ TDP 983 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)983 W estimated (TDP)GPU 900 + CPU 57 + Board 25 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.29
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.26
Token / kWh1.15M
Acquisition (system)EUR 45,748 full priceGPU EUR 39,000 · CPU EUR 3,499 · Board EUR 1,299 · RAM EUR 1,750 · PSU EUR 200
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 50,912
Output tokens (2 years)19.72B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (165 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-25033x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionMistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-2503NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Mistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-25033x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation EditionMistral-Small-3.1-24B-Instruct-25033x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.