Created bymario-alka.dePowered bygodcore.denoob2claw.detricoma.de
Contributed byMario AlkaByteDance Seed

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct

Performance benchmark · measured on 29.07.2026 09:16

Benchmark-IDrun-20260729-105338-5865d1
Timebench 3 - Kombi (Prefill + Generation)36BRuntime: llama.cppQuantisierung: Q4_K_M
Generation58,76tok/s
Prefill986,99tok/s
Time to First Token28.849,50ms
Total duration338,05s
Concurrency5parallel
Ranking in the field
950of 1234 systems

Performance benchmark · Primary metric: Generation-Speed (tok/s) · 5× concurrent

This run is better than 23 % of all comparable systems.
Generation 58,8 tok/s
-77 % vs Ø 260,2
Prefill 987,0 tok/s
-81 % vs Ø 5.330,6
Time to First Token 28.850 ms
-3 % vs Ø 29.782
Distribution in the field0 – 1.349 tok/s
Ø 260 Median Dieser Lauf

Wie schlägt sich dieser Benchmark mit anderen Modellen?

gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-0adf6d
1.349,3 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-itNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-184455-5b4937
1.301,9 tok/s
gemma-4-E2B-it3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-184456-4111a9
1.195,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181607-30d864
1.188,7 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4BNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260728-194135-5432cd
1.164,8 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260728-140954-9e81f9
1.136,3 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260730-035052-09627f
1.135,0 tok/s
gpt-oss-20bNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · run-20260729-032121-058a31
1.113,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-836a91
1.090,6 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260727-181606-8b381e
1.077,4 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-b8a818
1.071,0 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-4B3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260728-194136-038e92
1.051,1 tok/s
gpt-oss-20b3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-ffb18a
1.015,5 tok/s
Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3BNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition · run-20260729-032121-305ad6
1.007,8 tok/s
Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct this runNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti · run-20260729-105338-5865d1
58,8 tok/s

How does this benchmark compare on other GPUs?

Same model on different hardware · 5× concurrent · Generation (tok/s)

Configuration

benchmark-konfiguration — run-20260729-105338-5865d1
# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-105338-5865d1 # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti # CPU : AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics # RAM : 92 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--yarikdevcom--Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/cced0086e699de401821cce4b6fa69d3c6e87011/Seed_OSS_36B_Instruct_Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 60 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja
Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird./root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--yarikdevcom--Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct-GGUF/snapshots/cced0086e699de401821cce4b6fa69d3c6e87011/Seed_OSS_36B_Instruct_Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.60
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.16384
np4

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Anzeige
Model comparison

Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

1.0918195462730,001.3192.6393.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 3.193 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.087 ms (9 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 B...NVIDIA RTX A6000 - 349,2 tok/s Generation, 2.724 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.630 ms (30 Laufe)NVIDIA RTX A6000AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 - 107,3 tok/s Generation, 693 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 114.241 ms (16 Laufe)AMD Radeon AI PRO R97...AMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 680 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 17.557 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7900 ...AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB - 57,7 tok/s Generation, 1.357 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.389 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Radeon PRO W7800 ...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti - 39,2 tok/s Generation, 423 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 95.542 ms (3 Laufe)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 50...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)NVIDIA GeForce RTX 20...NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 839,7 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 460,0 tok/sNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 383,9 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 349,2 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 111,6 tok/s this runAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 107,3 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot 88,6 tok/sAMD Radeon PRO W7800 48GB 57,7 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 39,2 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 1,0 tok/s

CPUby processor

1.0918195462730,001.3192.6393.958Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8...AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 3.193 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 13.087 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores - 349,2 tok/s Generation, 2.017 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 46.669 ms (46 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 820 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.163 ms (9 Laufe)AMD Ryzen Threadrippe...Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU ...AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX wi...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 839,7 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 460,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 383,9 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 349,2 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 111,6 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 88,6 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4620 v2 @ 2.60GHz 1,0 tok/s

MBby mainboard

1.0918195462730,001.2982.5953.893Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.664 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 12.384 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI - 460,0 tok/s Generation, 3.141 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 10.624 ms (3 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE - 383,9 tok/s Generation, 2.210 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.174 ms (55 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI - 88,6 tok/s Generation, 820 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.163 ms (9 Laufe)ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC....Dell Inc. PowerEdge R820 - 1,0 tok/s Generation, 8 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 240.790 ms (1 Lauf)Dell Inc. PowerEdge R...Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) - 111,6 tok/s Generation, 992 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.392 ms (3 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ Meigao Innovation Tec...
ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 839,7 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 460,0 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 383,9 tok/s★ Meigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 111,6 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 88,6 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 1,0 tok/s

ENGby engine

1.0228085943811678322.0113.1904.369Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)vLLM - 349,2 tok/s Generation, 3.736 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 4.697 ms (18 Laufe)vLLMllama.cpp - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 1.465 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 53.294 ms (56 Laufe) | DIESER LAUF★ llama.cpp
★ llama.cpp 839,7 tok/s this runvLLM 349,2 tok/s

DRVby driver

9248828407987561.8971.9772.0582.139Prefill (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)unbekannt - 839,7 tok/s Generation, 2.018 tok/s Prefill, TTFT 41.473 ms (74 Laufe)unbekannt
unbekannt 839,7 tok/s
💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URLReset
⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh
⚙️ System utilization 100 %
🖥️ Acquisition EUR
🔌 Idle 50 W
⚡ TDP 477 W
☁️ External LLM (API)
Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh
Avg power (incl. idle)477 W estimated (TDP)GPU 450 + CPU 17 + Board 10 W full load
Avg cost / hourEUR 0.14
Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.68
Token / kWh443.24K
Acquisition (system)EUR 2,986 partial priceGPU EUR 999 · CPU EUR 549 · RAM EUR 1,288 · PSU EUR 150
Electricity (2 years)
TCO (2 years)EUR 5,494
Output tokens (2 years)3.71B
☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison
External LLM cost (2 years)
Savings vs. external (2 years)

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (50 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

Seed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 TiSeed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation EditionSeed-OSS-36B-InstructNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090Seed-OSS-36B-Instruct2x NVIDIA RTX A6000
Electricity cost (24 mo.)
Acquisition cost
Total cost (TCO)
Generated tokens (24 mo.)
Token price via API
Break-even point (days)
Result (savings / extra cost)

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.