# LLM-Benchmark Konfiguration # Modell : Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning # Engine : llama.cpp # Run-ID : run-20260729-105334-daa9ee # GPU : NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 # CPU : AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor # RAM : 126 GB bench@llm-benchmark:~$ /root/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server \ -m /root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/7131823f6f6ffda04b65763677f2f1dbe15eb3c5/nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16.f16.gguf.Q4_K_M.gguf \ --alias Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 8000 \ -ngl 999 \ -c 16384 \ -np 4 \ --jinja

Engine?Die Inferenz-Software, die das Modell ausliefert (z.B. vLLM oder llama.cpp). Sie bestimmt Geschwindigkeit, unterstuetzte Modellformate und welche Parameter ueberhaupt verfuegbar sind.	llamacpp
Modellalias?Der Name, unter dem das Modell ueber die API angesprochen wird. Genau dieser Wert muss im Request-Feld 'model' stehen.	Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning
Kontextlaenge?Maximale Anzahl Tokens (Eingabe + erzeugte Ausgabe zusammen), die das Modell pro Anfrage verarbeiten kann.	16384
Modellpfad?Pfad zur GGUF-Modelldatei, die geladen und ausgeliefert wird.	/root/.cache/huggingface/hub/models--DevQuasar--nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16-GGUF/snapshots/7131823f6f6ffda04b65763677f2f1dbe15eb3c5/nvidia.Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning-BF16.f16.gguf.Q4_K_M.gguf
GPU-Layer?Anzahl der auf die GPU ausgelagerten Modell-Layer. Hoeher = mehr VRAM und schneller; der Rest laeuft auf der CPU. 999 = alles auf GPU.	999
Kontext?Groesse des Kontextfensters in Token. 0 = der beim Training verwendete Kontext des Modells.	16384
np	4
execution_type	local

All benchmarks of this model To leaderboard

Model comparison

Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning on various hardware

All published performance runs of this model – each bubble a variant: position = prefill (X) × generation (Y), bubble size = number of runs. Closer to the top right = faster. ★ Marked gold = this benchmark.

GPUby graphics card

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1.791,5 tok/s★ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 1.706,7 tok/s this runNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 1.651,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti 896,6 tok/sNVIDIA RTX A6000 527,0 tok/sNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti 262,5 tok/sAMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 122,4 tok/sAMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 76,7 tok/s

CPUby processor

AMD Ryzen 9 9950X 16-Core Processor 1.791,5 tok/sAMD Ryzen 5 5600X 6-Core Processor 1.774,4 tok/s★ AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D 8-Core Processor 1.706,7 tok/s this runAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX 24-Cores 1.651,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with Radeon Graphics 896,6 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores 527,0 tok/sAMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX 32-Cores 262,5 tok/sIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-4657L v2 @ 2.40GHz 76,7 tok/s

MBby mainboard

ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ProArt X870E-CREATOR WIFI 1.791,5 tok/s★ ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG STRIX B550-A GAMING 1.774,4 tok/s this runASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX90E-SAGE SE 1.651,0 tok/sMeigao Innovation Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd DRFXL (MotherBoard Series) 896,6 tok/sASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI 262,5 tok/sDell Inc. PowerEdge R820 76,7 tok/s

ENGby engine

★ llama.cpp 1.791,5 tok/s this runvLLM 527,0 tok/s

DRVby driver

unbekannt 1.791,5 tok/s

💰 Economics

Economics of this run

Operating cost, TCO and comparison with the next-best runs of the same model at identical concurrency (5× concurrent). Methodology →

⚙️ ConfigurationAll metrics and charts below follow these settings – based on a 24-month runtime.Save to URL Reset

⚡ Electricity price EUR/kWh

⚙️ System utilization 100 %

🖥️ Acquisition EUR

🔌 Idle 72 W

⚡ TDP 622 W

☁️ External LLM (API) show

Input €/1M Output €/1M Input per output token

Electricity0.30 EUR/kWh

Avg power (incl. idle)622 W estimated (TDP)GPU 575 + CPU 35 + Board 12 W full load

Avg cost / hourEUR 0.19

Electricity / 1M tokensEUR 0.052

Token / kWh5.75M

Acquisition (system)EUR 4,986 full priceGPU EUR 3,300 · CPU EUR 349 · Board EUR 149 · RAM EUR 1,008 · PSU EUR 180

Electricity (2 years)–

TCO (2 years)EUR 8,253

Output tokens (2 years)62.57B

☁️ External LLM (API) – comparison

External LLM cost (2 years)–

Savings vs. external (2 years)–

All values above and the charts below take the configured system utilization into account: at X% the system generates only X% of the time, the rest it idles (72 W). Cost per hour drops (more idle), cost per token rises.

Cost over 2 years – electricity only

Cost over 2 years – incl. acquisition (TCO)

Speed vs. tokens per euro

Euro per 1M tokens

Comparison vs. API – economics per benchmark

	Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090	Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition	Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-ReasoningNVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition	Nemotron-3-Nano-Omni-30B-A3B-Reasoning3x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition
Electricity cost (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Acquisition cost	–	–	–	–
Total cost (TCO)	–	–	–	–
Generated tokens (24 mo.)	–	–	–	–
Token price via API	–	–	–	–
Break-even point (days)	–	–	–	–
Result (savings / extra cost)	–	–	–	–

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 · this run 992 tok/s NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 1,007 tok/s NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 986 tok/s 3× NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition 931 tok/s

Comparison with up to 3 next-best runs of this model at the same concurrency (at least one on different hardware). Power = GPU TDP + CPU (idle + 15 %) + board (estimated), acquisition = full system (GPU + CPU + board + RAM + PSU), prices = stored market prices.

Contributed by

Mario Alka Administrator

@marioalka

Ich bin Unternehmer, Softwareentwickler und KI-Enthusiast. Seit vielen Jahren entwickle ich Unternehmenssoftware und beschäftige mich inzwischen fast täglich mit lokalen LLMs, KI-Agenten und leistungsfähiger KI-Hardware.

Mit LLM-Benchmark.de möchte ich eine Plattform schaffen, auf der Modelle, GPUs und Agenten objektiv und reproduzierbar miteinander verglichen werden.